BPYPN
Price
$12.90
Change
-$0.45 (-3.37%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
HOUS
Price
$5.07
Change
-$0.08 (-1.55%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
663.18M
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPN vs HOUS

Header iconBPYPN vs HOUS Comparison
Open Charts BPYPN vs HOUSBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$12.90
Change-$0.45 (-3.37%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Anywhere Real Estate
Price$5.07
Change-$0.08 (-1.55%)
Volume$9.45K
Capitalization663.18M
BPYPN vs HOUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPN vs. HOUS commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPN is a Hold and HOUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPN: $13.32 vs. HOUS: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: BPYPN and HOUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPN: 26% vs. HOUS: 104%
Market capitalization -- BPYPN: $0 vs. HOUS: $663.18M
BPYPN [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. HOUS’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $663.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPN is a better buy in the long-term than HOUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOUS is a better buy in the short-term than BPYPN.

Price Growth

BPYPN (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while HOUS (@Real Estate Development) price change was +7.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOUS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.03% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOUS YTD gains are higher at: 56.061 vs. BPYPN (13.090). BPYPN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3B vs. HOUS (225M). BPYPN has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. HOUS (106M). HOUS has less debt than BPYPN: HOUS (3.11B) vs BPYPN (71B). BPYPN has higher revenues than HOUS: BPYPN (9.48B) vs HOUS (5.64B).
BPYPNHOUSBPYPN / HOUS
CapitalizationN/A663M-
EBITDA3B225M1,331%
Gain YTD13.09056.06123%
P/E RatioN/A4.51-
Revenue9.48B5.64B168%
Total Cash2.34B106M2,208%
Total Debt71B3.11B2,281%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOUS: Fundamental Ratings
HOUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPNHOUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSCC57.588.85
+18.16%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp
WMK73.103.76
+5.42%
Weis Markets
FCNCP21.56-0.03
-0.14%
First Citizens BancShares
HIFS245.03-3.45
-1.39%
Hingham Institution for Savings
VEEA1.40-0.05
-3.45%
Veea Inc

BPYPN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPN has been loosely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPN jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPN
1D Price
Change %
BPYPN100%
-0.22%
BPYPP - BPYPN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
BPYPO - BPYPN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
NMRK - BPYPN
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
HOUS - BPYPN
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
RMAX - BPYPN
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.73%
More

HOUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOUS has been loosely correlated with RMAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOUS jumps, then RMAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOUS
1D Price
Change %
HOUS100%
+1.98%
RMAX - HOUS
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.73%
JLL - HOUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
CWK - HOUS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
CBRE - HOUS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
NMRK - HOUS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More