BPYPP
Price
$14.15
Change
-$0.19 (-1.32%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
FTHM
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Updated
Apr 28, 03:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.34M
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPYPP vs FTHM

Header iconBPYPP vs FTHM Comparison
Open Charts BPYPP vs FTHMBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$14.15
Change-$0.19 (-1.32%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Fathom Holdings
Price$0.82
Change+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization41.34M
BPYPP vs FTHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPYPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPP vs. FTHM commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPP is a Buy and FTHM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPP: $14.34 vs. FTHM: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: BPYPP and FTHM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPP: 13% vs. FTHM: 38%
Market capitalization -- BPYPP: $0 vs. FTHM: $41.34M
BPYPP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. FTHM’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $41.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTHM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTHM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPP is a better buy in the long-term than FTHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTHM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FTHM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTHM is a better buy in the short-term than BPYPP.

Price Growth

BPYPP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while FTHM (@Real Estate Development) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPYPP is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2025.

FTHM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.38% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPP YTD gains are higher at: 7.371 vs. FTHM (-49.013). BPYPP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3B vs. FTHM (-17.31M). BPYPP has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. FTHM (7.4M). FTHM has less debt than BPYPP: FTHM (17.6M) vs BPYPP (71B). BPYPP has higher revenues than FTHM: BPYPP (9.48B) vs FTHM (345M).
BPYPPFTHMBPYPP / FTHM
CapitalizationN/A41.3M-
EBITDA3B-17.31M-17,306%
Gain YTD7.371-49.013-15%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.48B345M2,749%
Total Cash2.34B7.4M31,639%
Total Debt71B17.6M403,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPYPP: Fundamental Ratings
BPYPP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPPFTHM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPYPP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRFS3.980.15
+3.92%
BRF - Brasil Foods SA
ASRV2.420.08
+3.42%
AmeriServ Financial
POET4.110.05
+1.23%
POET Technologies
NBHC35.33-0.07
-0.20%
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS Corp
CPRT60.90-1.07
-1.73%
Copart

BPYPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPP has been closely correlated with BPYPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPYPP jumps, then BPYPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPP
1D Price
Change %
BPYPP100%
+0.20%
BPYPO - BPYPP
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
BPYPN - BPYPP
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
HHH - BPYPP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
JLL - BPYPP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
CWK - BPYPP
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
More

FTHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHM and REAX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHM and REAX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHM
1D Price
Change %
FTHM100%
-7.59%
REAX - FTHM
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
BPYPP - FTHM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
HHH - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KW - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
EXPI - FTHM
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More