Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where FTHM declined for three days, in 333 of 362 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FTHM turned negative on September 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.
The Aroon Indicator for FTHM entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 12 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +6.38% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FTHM advanced for three days, in 212 of 251 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
FTHM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.770) is normal, around the industry mean (3.309). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (118.735). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.041) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FTHM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FTHM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where REAX declined for three days, in 257 of 297 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on REAX as a result. In 78 of 97 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for REAX entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 53 of 68 cases where REAX's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for REAX just turned positive on September 25, 2026. Looking at past instances where REAX's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 40 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Following a +2.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where REAX advanced for three days, in 216 of 260 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
REAX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 68 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.440) is normal, around the industry mean (3.309). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (118.735). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.192) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. REAX’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. REAX’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
FTHM | REAX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTHM's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as REAX (68). This means that FTHM’s stock grew similarly to REAX’s over the last 12 months.
FTHM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as REAX (100). This means that FTHM’s stock grew similarly to REAX’s over the last 12 months.
REAX's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FTHM (98). This means that REAX’s stock grew similarly to FTHM’s over the last 12 months.
REAX's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FTHM (98). This means that REAX’s stock grew similarly to FTHM’s over the last 12 months.
REAX's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FTHM (100). This means that REAX’s stock grew similarly to FTHM’s over the last 12 months.
| FTHM | REAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTHM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while REAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTHM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTHM (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -11.81% price change this week, while REAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.40%.
FTHM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
REAX is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHM and AGNT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHM and AGNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHM | 100% | -4.87% | ||
| AGNT - FTHM | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
| DOUG - FTHM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AIRE - FTHM | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.09% | ||
| OPEN - FTHM | 23% Poorly correlated | -8.84% | ||
| REAX - FTHM | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REAX has been loosely correlated with AGNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if REAX jumps, then AGNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REAX | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| AGNT - REAX | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| NMRK - REAX | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CWK - REAX | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| DOUG - REAX | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| JLL - REAX | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||