BPZZF
Price
$12.22
Change
-$0.08 (-0.65%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
DPZUF
Price
$18.68
Change
+$0.07 (+0.38%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BPZZF vs DPZUF

Header iconBPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$12.22
Change-$0.08 (-0.65%)
Volume$575
CapitalizationN/A
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$18.68
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
Volume$943
CapitalizationN/A
BPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPZUF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and DPZUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $12.22 vs. DPZUF: $18.67)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 90% vs. DPZUF: 182%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $262.28M vs. DPZUF: $1.77B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $262.28M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -5.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-5.24% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($1.77B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($262M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DPZUF (28.72) vs BPZZF (12.14). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 6.001 vs. DPZUF (-50.400). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 312M vs. BPZZF (50.3M). DPZUF has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. BPZZF (6.17M). BPZZF has less debt than DPZUF: BPZZF (86.5M) vs DPZUF (1.46B). DPZUF has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPZUF (2.37B) vs BPZZF (49.2M).
BPZZFDPZUFBPZZF / DPZUF
Capitalization262M1.77B15%
EBITDA50.3M312M16%
Gain YTD6.001-50.400-12%
P/E Ratio12.1428.7242%
Revenue49.2M2.37B2%
Total Cash6.17M87.7M7%
Total Debt86.5M1.46B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
7264
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (18). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (72). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (80). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (96). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGG59.400.61
+1.04%
National Grid PLC
FLNG21.390.04
+0.19%
FLEX LNG Ltd
HCP33.900.06
+0.18%
HashiCorp
ORN8.12-0.31
-3.68%
Orion Group Holdings
PASG0.67-0.05
-7.15%
Passage Bio

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
-0.47%
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More