BPZZF
Price
$11.95
Change
-$0.15 (-1.24%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
257.21M
DPZUF
Price
$15.50
Change
+$0.10 (+0.65%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
Ad is loading...

BPZZF vs DPZUF

Header iconBPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$11.95
Change-$0.15 (-1.24%)
Volume$701
Capitalization257.21M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$15.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.65%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.57B
BPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPZUF commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and DPZUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $11.95 vs. DPZUF: $15.50)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 62% vs. DPZUF: 52%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $257.21M vs. DPZUF: $1.57B
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $257.21M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $221.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.22% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($1.57B) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($257M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DPZUF (182.26) vs BPZZF (11.24). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: -3.049 vs. DPZUF (-15.761). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. BPZZF (52M). DPZUF has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. BPZZF (4.57M). BPZZF has less debt than DPZUF: BPZZF (97.1M) vs DPZUF (1.46B). DPZUF has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPZUF (2.26B) vs BPZZF (49.5M).
BPZZFDPZUFBPZZF / DPZUF
Capitalization257M1.57B16%
EBITDA52M195M27%
Gain YTD-3.049-15.76119%
P/E Ratio11.24182.266%
Revenue49.5M2.26B2%
Total Cash4.57M87.7M5%
Total Debt97.1M1.46B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
8492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5182
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (33). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (92). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (82). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPZZF (45). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOAX38.490.68
+1.80%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class A
GMNCX9.71N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Mini Mites C
CSECX30.06N/A
N/A
Calvert Equity C
HSMSX11.05N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value R4
FZABX25.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.21%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More