BPZZF
Price
$15.76
Change
+$0.06 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
332.98M
DPZUF
Price
$10.27
Change
-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
916.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs DPZUF

Header iconBPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$15.76
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization332.98M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$10.27
Change-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Volume$524
Capitalization916.51M
BPZZF vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. DPZUF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $15.76 vs. DPZUF: $10.27)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 189% vs. DPZUF: 113%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $332.98M vs. DPZUF: $916.51M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $332.98M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $916.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.28% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -14.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($917M) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($333M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: DPZUF (133.33) vs BPZZF (12.68). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 27.810 vs. DPZUF (-44.185). DPZUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195M vs. BPZZF (58M). DPZUF has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. BPZZF (5.31M). BPZZF has less debt than DPZUF: BPZZF (86.6M) vs DPZUF (1.46B). DPZUF has higher revenues than BPZZF: DPZUF (2.26B) vs BPZZF (50.8M).
BPZZFDPZUFBPZZF / DPZUF
Capitalization333M917M36%
EBITDA58M195M30%
Gain YTD27.810-44.185-63%
P/E Ratio12.68133.3310%
Revenue50.8M2.26B2%
Total Cash5.31M87.7M6%
Total Debt86.6M1.46B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (14). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BPZZF (100). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (65). This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPZZF (100). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OANBX38.060.01
+0.03%
Oakmark Equity and Income Institutional
GAGEX24.27N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy
BMIAX7.61N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Income Stock A
GOFCX27.39N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth C
BUITX24.06N/A
N/A
Buffalo Mid Cap Discovery Inst

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+0.38%
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-14.35%
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.09%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More