BPZZF
Price
$14.38
Change
+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
304.97M
LOCO
Price
$10.21
Change
-$0.12 (-1.16%)
Updated
Aug 8, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
309.85M
83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPZZF vs LOCO

Header iconBPZZF vs LOCO Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs LOCOBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$14.38
Change+$0.18 (+1.27%)
Volume$412
Capitalization304.97M
El Pollo Loco Holdings
Price$10.21
Change-$0.12 (-1.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization309.85M
BPZZF vs LOCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. LOCO commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a StrongBuy and LOCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $14.38 vs. LOCO: $10.33)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and LOCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 49% vs. LOCO: 50%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $304.97M vs. LOCO: $309.85M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $304.97M. LOCO’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $309.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than LOCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LOCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the short-term than LOCO.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while LOCO (@Restaurants) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOCO($310M) and BPZZF($305M) have the same market capitalization . BPZZF has higher P/E ratio than LOCO: BPZZF (14.78) vs LOCO (12.05). BPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 16.610 vs. LOCO (-10.485). LOCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.3M vs. BPZZF (49.3M). LOCO has more cash in the bank: 8.99M vs. BPZZF (4.58M). BPZZF has less debt than LOCO: BPZZF (86.6M) vs LOCO (258M). LOCO has higher revenues than BPZZF: LOCO (480M) vs BPZZF (50M).
BPZZFLOCOBPZZF / LOCO
Capitalization305M310M98%
EBITDA49.3M55.3M89%
Gain YTD16.610-10.485-158%
P/E Ratio14.7812.05123%
Revenue50M480M10%
Total Cash4.58M8.99M51%
Total Debt86.6M258M34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs LOCO: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
LOCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9160
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
7072
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOCO (60) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOCO (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew significantly faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (72) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (61) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOCO (72) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFLOCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRCDF22.400.02
+0.09%
Laurentian Bank of Canada
IBIDF43.00N/A
N/A
Ibiden Co. Ltd.
AUEEF0.11N/A
N/A
Aura Energy, Ltd.
IFNNY40.03-0.13
-0.32%
Infineon Technologies AG
HLRTF0.06N/A
-3.05%
HILLCREST ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
+1.25%
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LOCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOCO has been loosely correlated with DRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOCO jumps, then DRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOCO
1D Price
Change %
LOCO100%
+0.88%
DRI - LOCO
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CAKE - LOCO
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
DIN - LOCO
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
FRSH - LOCO
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
RRGB - LOCO
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
More