BPZZF
Price
$11.76
Change
-$0.12 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
245.35M
LOCO
Price
$11.45
Change
-$0.02 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
342.8M
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPZZF vs LOCO

Header iconBPZZF vs LOCO Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs LOCOBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$11.76
Change-$0.12 (-1.01%)
Volume$179
Capitalization245.35M
El Pollo Loco Holdings
Price$11.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
Volume$178.91K
Capitalization342.8M
BPZZF vs LOCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. LOCO commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and LOCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $11.76 vs. LOCO: $11.45)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and LOCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 18% vs. LOCO: 102%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $245.35M vs. LOCO: $342.8M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $245.35M. LOCO’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $342.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $201.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPZZF and LOCO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPZZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOCO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BPZZF and LOCO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while LOCO (@Restaurants) price change was +4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +161.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOCO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOCO($343M) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($245M). LOCO has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: LOCO (14.49) vs BPZZF (11.76). LOCO YTD gains are higher at: -0.780 vs. BPZZF (-4.623). LOCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.3M vs. BPZZF (50.3M). LOCO has more cash in the bank: 7.9M vs. BPZZF (6.17M). BPZZF has less debt than LOCO: BPZZF (86.5M) vs LOCO (264M). LOCO has higher revenues than BPZZF: LOCO (471M) vs BPZZF (49.2M).
BPZZFLOCOBPZZF / LOCO
Capitalization245M343M71%
EBITDA50.3M55.3M91%
Gain YTD-4.623-0.780593%
P/E Ratio11.7614.4981%
Revenue49.2M471M10%
Total Cash6.17M7.9M78%
Total Debt86.5M264M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs LOCO: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
LOCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
7272
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOCO (60) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (72) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

LOCO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BPZZF (58) in the null industry. This means that LOCO’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

LOCO's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BPZZF (55) in the null industry. This means that LOCO’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPZZFLOCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
45%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEPS3.140.07
+2.28%
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
CHR2.500.05
+2.10%
Cheer Holding
DOYU15.920.23
+1.47%
DouYu International Holdings Limited
WEC99.030.64
+0.65%
WEC Energy Group
BL59.65-0.36
-0.60%
BlackLine

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More

LOCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOCO has been loosely correlated with BJRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOCO jumps, then BJRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOCO
1D Price
Change %
LOCO100%
-0.17%
BJRI - LOCO
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
CNNE - LOCO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
DIN - LOCO
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
FRSH - LOCO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
RRGB - LOCO
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More