BPZZF
Price
$12.50
Change
+$0.25 (+2.04%)
Updated
Feb 18 closing price
Capitalization
264.32M
LOCO
Price
$11.83
Change
-$0.53 (-4.29%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
354.18M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPZZF vs LOCO

Header iconBPZZF vs LOCO Comparison
Open Charts BPZZF vs LOCOBanner chart's image
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
Price$12.50
Change+$0.25 (+2.04%)
Volume$5.11K
Capitalization264.32M
El Pollo Loco Holdings
Price$11.83
Change-$0.53 (-4.29%)
Volume$168.68K
Capitalization354.18M
BPZZF vs LOCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPZZF vs. LOCO commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPZZF is a Hold and LOCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BPZZF: $12.50 vs. LOCO: $11.83)
Brand notoriety: BPZZF and LOCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPZZF: 359% vs. LOCO: 98%
Market capitalization -- BPZZF: $264.32M vs. LOCO: $354.18M
BPZZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $264.32M. LOCO’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $354.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $218.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPZZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPZZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than LOCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BPZZF (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while LOCO (@Restaurants) price change was -4.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOCO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.17% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOCO($354M) has a higher market cap than BPZZF($264M). LOCO has higher P/E ratio than BPZZF: LOCO (14.97) vs BPZZF (11.87). LOCO YTD gains are higher at: 2.513 vs. BPZZF (1.379). LOCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.3M vs. BPZZF (50.3M). LOCO has more cash in the bank: 7.9M vs. BPZZF (6.17M). BPZZF has less debt than LOCO: BPZZF (86.5M) vs LOCO (264M). LOCO has higher revenues than BPZZF: LOCO (471M) vs BPZZF (49.2M).
BPZZFLOCOBPZZF / LOCO
Capitalization264M354M75%
EBITDA50.3M55.3M91%
Gain YTD1.3792.51355%
P/E Ratio11.8714.9779%
Revenue49.2M471M10%
Total Cash6.17M7.9M78%
Total Debt86.5M264M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPZZF vs LOCO: Fundamental Ratings
BPZZF
LOCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
7171
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPZZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOCO (60) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (71) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

BPZZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LOCO (48) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BPZZF’s stock grew similarly to LOCO’s over the last 12 months.

LOCO's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BPZZF (48) in the null industry. This means that LOCO’s stock grew similarly to BPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZMAX17.050.32
+1.91%
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value A
JEMOX32.42-0.23
-0.70%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5
DSCLX15.31-0.13
-0.84%
DFA International Social Cor Eq Instl
JNVIX18.92-0.19
-0.99%
Jensen Quality Mid Cap I
LGOTX31.61-1.45
-4.39%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R5

BPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPZZF has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPZZF jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPZZF
1D Price
Change %
BPZZF100%
N/A
SBUX - BPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
LOCO - BPZZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
JACK - BPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
DENN - BPZZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
PZRIF - BPZZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More