BQ
Price
$3.08
Change
-$0.11 (-3.45%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.12M
JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.07B
Ad is loading...

BQ vs JUMSF

Header iconBQ vs JUMSF Comparison
Open Charts BQ vs JUMSFBanner chart's image
Boqii Holding
Price$3.08
Change-$0.11 (-3.45%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization1.12M
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.07B
BQ vs JUMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQ vs. JUMSF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQ is a Hold and JUMSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BQ: $3.08 vs. JUMSF: $27.50)
Brand notoriety: BQ and JUMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQ: 8% vs. JUMSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BQ: $1.12M vs. JUMSF: $4.07B
BQ [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.12M. JUMSF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUMSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than BQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BQ (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -7.78% price change this week, while JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BQ is expected to report earnings on Sep 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.69% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($4.07B) has a higher market cap than BQ($1.12M). JUMSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BQ (-14.444). JUMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 321M vs. BQ (-61.01M). BQ has higher revenues than JUMSF: BQ (1.09B) vs JUMSF (872M).
BQJUMSFBQ / JUMSF
Capitalization1.12M4.07B0%
EBITDA-61.01M321M-19%
Gain YTD-14.4440.000-
P/E RatioN/A16.00-
Revenue1.09B872M125%
Total CashN/A712M-
Total DebtN/A286M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUMSF: Fundamental Ratings
JUMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSAFX23.860.35
+1.49%
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
BDOKX10.85-0.07
-0.64%
iShares MSCI Total Intl Idx K
OGLIX100.33-1.67
-1.64%
Invesco Global R6
HWAZX39.64-0.69
-1.71%
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
STCIX8.91-0.20
-2.20%
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk A

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and DSITF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and DSITF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
DSITF - JUMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
ZSHGY - JUMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQ - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASO - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More