BQCNF
Price
$112.00
Change
-$5.00 (-4.27%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
HCKG
Price
$22.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQCNF vs HCKG

Header iconBQCNF vs HCKG Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs HCKGBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$112.00
Change-$5.00 (-4.27%)
Volume$156
Capitalization9.98B
Hocking Valley Bancshares, Inc. (OH)
Price$22.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
BQCNF vs HCKG Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. HCKG commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Hold and HCKG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $112.00 vs. HCKG: $22.00)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and HCKG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 105% vs. HCKG: 79%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $9.98B vs. HCKG: $0
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. HCKG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCKG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCKG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCKG is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCKG (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCKG YTD gains are higher at: 15.216 vs. BQCNF (-20.000).
BQCNFHCKGBQCNF / HCKG
Capitalization9.98BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.00015.216-131%
P/E Ratio25.15N/A-
Revenue1.08BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs HCKG: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
HCKG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9892
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
9100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCKG's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BQCNF (94). This means that HCKG’s stock grew significantly faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HCKG (100). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew similarly to HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HCKG (100). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew significantly faster than HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

HCKG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (80). This means that HCKG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as HCKG (100). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew similarly to HCKG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEGRX17.070.08
+0.47%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq R
PCCGX10.77N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value C
HILIX21.85N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value I
GGEAX22.45N/A
N/A
Nationwide Global Sust Eq A
LDFOX15.62N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More

HCKG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCKG and KNFSF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCKG and KNFSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCKG
1D Price
Change %
HCKG100%
N/A
KNFSF - HCKG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOY - HCKG
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKQNY - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
BKALF - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQCNF - HCKG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More