BQCNF
Price
$118.46
Change
+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
MTPOY
Price
$27.30
Change
+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQCNF vs MTPOY

Header iconBQCNF vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$118.46
Change+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.98B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.30
Change+$0.30 (+1.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.8B
BQCNF vs MTPOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. MTPOY commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Buy and MTPOY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $118.46 vs. MTPOY: $27.30)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 311% vs. MTPOY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $9.98B vs. MTPOY: $4.8B
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQCNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTPOY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTPOY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BQCNF and MTPOY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTPOY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($9.98B) has a higher market cap than MTPOY($4.8B). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOY: BQCNF (25.15) vs MTPOY (7.91). MTPOY YTD gains are higher at: 2.845 vs. BQCNF (-15.386). BQCNF has less debt than MTPOY: BQCNF (8.08B) vs MTPOY (102B). MTPOY has higher revenues than BQCNF: MTPOY (118B) vs BQCNF (1.08B).
BQCNFMTPOYBQCNF / MTPOY
Capitalization9.98B4.8B208%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.3862.845-541%
P/E Ratio25.157.91318%
Revenue1.08B118B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.08B102B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4146
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
556
SMR RATING
1..100
121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTPOY's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (95). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (55). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (12). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (55). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (58). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQCNFMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACVF47.470.19
+0.39%
American Conservative Values ETF
UTG36.360.10
+0.28%
Reaves Utility Income Fund
IBMN26.75N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bd ETF
KEMQ22.65-0.03
-0.13%
KraneShares Em Mkts Cnsmr Tech ETF
AVS12.75-0.03
-0.21%
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BQCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BQCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BQCNF - MTPOY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - MTPOY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - MTPOY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - MTPOY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSG - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More