BQCNF
Price
$140.00
Change
+$20.00 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
MTPOY
Price
$27.74
Change
+$2.02 (+7.85%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

BQCNF vs MTPOY

Header iconBQCNF vs MTPOY Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs MTPOYBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$140.00
Change+$20.00 (+16.67%)
Volume$2
CapitalizationN/A
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$27.74
Change+$2.02 (+7.85%)
Volume$427
CapitalizationN/A
BQCNF vs MTPOY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. MTPOY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Buy and MTPOY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $140.00 vs. MTPOY: $27.74)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and MTPOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 100% vs. MTPOY: 5%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $9.98B vs. MTPOY: $4.8B
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. MTPOY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTPOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTPOY is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTPOY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTPOY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTPOY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($9.98B) has a higher market cap than MTPOY($4.8B). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOY: BQCNF (25.15) vs MTPOY (7.91). MTPOY YTD gains are higher at: 85.901 vs. BQCNF (33.206). BQCNF has less debt than MTPOY: BQCNF (8.08B) vs MTPOY (102B). MTPOY has higher revenues than BQCNF: MTPOY (118B) vs BQCNF (1.08B).
BQCNFMTPOYBQCNF / MTPOY
Capitalization9.98B4.8B208%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.20685.90139%
P/E Ratio25.157.91318%
Revenue1.08B118B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.08B102B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs MTPOY: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
MTPOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3747
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8735
SMR RATING
1..100
121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6248
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTPOY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (100). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (87). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (12). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (47). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOY's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (62). This means that MTPOY’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQCNFMTPOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MTPOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOBAX20.38-0.06
-0.29%
Tributary Balanced Instl
VBAIX51.18-0.16
-0.31%
Vanguard Balanced Index I
IRMTX11.24-0.10
-0.88%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S2
BRSHX14.62-0.16
-1.08%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C
FWTFX34.96-0.39
-1.10%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTPOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOY has been loosely correlated with BQCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOY jumps, then BQCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOY
1D Price
Change %
MTPOY100%
N/A
BQCNF - MTPOY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - MTPOY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - MTPOY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - MTPOY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSG - MTPOY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More