BQCNF
Price
$118.46
Change
+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
10.04B
TDCB
Price
$9.20
Change
-$0.02 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.82M
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQCNF vs TDCB

Header iconBQCNF vs TDCB Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs TDCBBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$118.46
Change+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization10.04B
Third Century Ban
Price$9.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.82M
BQCNF vs TDCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. TDCB commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Buy and TDCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $118.46 vs. TDCB: $9.20)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and TDCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 138% vs. TDCB: 109%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $10.04B vs. TDCB: $10.82M
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.04B. TDCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BQCNF and TDCB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQCNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDCB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQCNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TDCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDCB is a better buy in the short-term than BQCNF.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TDCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

TDCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($10B) has a higher market cap than TDCB($10.8M). BQCNF has higher P/E ratio than TDCB: BQCNF (18.62) vs TDCB (8.14). TDCB YTD gains are higher at: 3.057 vs. BQCNF (-15.386). TDCB has less debt than BQCNF: TDCB (24.6M) vs BQCNF (9.45B). BQCNF has higher revenues than TDCB: BQCNF (1.15B) vs TDCB (9.17M).
BQCNFTDCBBQCNF / TDCB
Capitalization10B10.8M92,593%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.3863.057-503%
P/E Ratio18.628.14229%
Revenue1.15B9.17M12,540%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.45B24.6M38,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs TDCB: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
TDCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5898
SMR RATING
1..100
1553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
509
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TDCB's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (84). This means that TDCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDCB (98). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDCB (53). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (59). This means that TDCB’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (50). This means that TDCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQCNFTDCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PI186.377.51
+4.20%
Impinj
ABNB129.852.96
+2.33%
Airbnb
VTOL38.060.40
+1.06%
Bristow Group
FVCB13.640.05
+0.37%
FVCBankcorp
PMN0.53-0.02
-2.84%
ProMIS Neurosciences

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TDCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDCB and FKYS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDCB and FKYS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCB
1D Price
Change %
TDCB100%
N/A
FKYS - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
ILPMF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQCNF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
HARL - TDCB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More