BQCNF
Price
$118.46
Change
+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.98B
TDCB
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.19M
84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BQCNF vs TDCB

Header iconBQCNF vs TDCB Comparison
Open Charts BQCNF vs TDCBBanner chart's image
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
Price$118.46
Change+$8.46 (+7.69%)
Volume$300
Capitalization9.98B
Third Century Ban
Price$9.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization7.19M
BQCNF vs TDCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BQCNF vs. TDCB commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BQCNF is a Buy and TDCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BQCNF: $118.46 vs. TDCB: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: BQCNF and TDCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BQCNF: 207% vs. TDCB: 26%
Market capitalization -- BQCNF: $9.98B vs. TDCB: $7.19M
BQCNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.98B. TDCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BQCNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BQCNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TDCB is a better buy in the long-term than BQCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BQCNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BQCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TDCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDCB is a better buy in the short-term than BQCNF.

Price Growth

BQCNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TDCB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

TDCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BQCNF($9.98B) has a higher market cap than TDCB($7.19M). TDCB YTD gains are higher at: 0.817 vs. BQCNF (-15.386). TDCB has less debt than BQCNF: TDCB (24.6M) vs BQCNF (8.08B). BQCNF has higher revenues than TDCB: BQCNF (1.08B) vs TDCB (5.47M).
BQCNFTDCBBQCNF / TDCB
Capitalization9.98B7.19M138,812%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-15.3860.817-1,884%
P/E Ratio25.15N/A-
Revenue1.08B5.47M19,777%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.08B24.6M32,837%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BQCNF vs TDCB: Fundamental Ratings
BQCNF
TDCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4830
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5694
SMR RATING
1..100
1554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TDCB's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (95). This means that TDCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDCB (94). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

BQCNF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDCB (54). This means that BQCNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BQCNF (56). This means that TDCB’s stock grew similarly to BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BQCNF (54). This means that TDCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BQCNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BQCNFTDCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BQCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGO11.690.09
+0.73%
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
XTJA29.950.13
+0.43%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jan
EWU40.380.15
+0.37%
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
IGCB45.64N/A
N/A
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
IBMN26.74-0.01
-0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bd ETF

BQCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQCNF has been loosely correlated with MTPOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQCNF jumps, then MTPOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQCNF
1D Price
Change %
BQCNF100%
N/A
MTPOY - BQCNF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVR - BQCNF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBAJF - BQCNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - BQCNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - BQCNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TDCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDCB and FKYS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDCB and FKYS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCB
1D Price
Change %
TDCB100%
N/A
FKYS - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
ILPMF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQCNF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HARL - TDCB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More