It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BRCC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while SENEB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +13.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.04%.
BRCC is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
SENEB is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
BRCC | SENEB | BRCC / SENEB | |
Capitalization | 957M | 409M | 234% |
EBITDA | -42.94M | 145M | -30% |
Gain YTD | -19.284 | 37.940 | -51% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.48 | - |
Revenue | 396M | 1.48B | 27% |
Total Cash | 12.4M | 7.17M | 173% |
Total Debt | 109M | 669M | 16% |
SENEB | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRCC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRCC has been loosely correlated with INDFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRCC jumps, then INDFY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRCC | 100% | +2.45% | ||
INDFY - BRCC | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CENTA - BRCC | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.65% | ||
CENT - BRCC | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.65% | ||
NBND - BRCC | 29% Poorly correlated | -18.37% | ||
DAR - BRCC | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEB and HRL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEB and HRL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SENEB | 100% | +1.08% | ||
HRL - SENEB | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
SENEA - SENEB | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
BRCC - SENEB | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
STKL - SENEB | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
MKC - SENEB | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
More |