BRDCF
Price
$45.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.61B
MOD
Price
$141.19
Change
+$2.54 (+1.83%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.28B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs MOD

Header iconBRDCF vs MOD Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs MODBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$45.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$186
Capitalization30.61B
Modine Manufacturing
Price$141.19
Change+$2.54 (+1.83%)
Volume$911.37K
Capitalization7.28B
BRDCF vs MOD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. MOD commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Buy and MOD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $45.20 vs. MOD: $141.19)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and MOD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 117% vs. MOD: 89%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $30.61B vs. MOD: $7.28B
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $30.61B. MOD’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $7.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than MOD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MOD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the short-term than MOD.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.72% price change this week, while MOD (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($30.6B) has a higher market cap than MOD($7.28B). MOD has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: MOD (40.46) vs BRDCF (22.95). BRDCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.590 vs. MOD (21.789). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 698B vs. MOD (355M). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 698B vs. MOD (124M). MOD has less debt than BRDCF: MOD (527M) vs BRDCF (795B). BRDCF has higher revenues than MOD: BRDCF (4.37T) vs MOD (2.61B).
BRDCFMODBRDCF / MOD
Capitalization30.6B7.28B420%
EBITDA698B355M196,620%
Gain YTD25.59021.789117%
P/E Ratio22.9540.4657%
Revenue4.37T2.61B167,754%
Total Cash698B124M562,903%
Total Debt795B527M150,854%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs MOD: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
MOD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4525
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
954
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOD (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOD’s over the last 12 months.

MOD's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (45) in the null industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

MOD's SMR Rating (43) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

MOD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (50) in the null industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOD (54) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFMOD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNTC13.990.29
+2.12%
Benitec Biopharma
CVLT193.032.73
+1.43%
Commvault Systems
NPACU10.28N/A
N/A
New Providence Acquisition Corp III
DWSN1.80-0.03
-1.64%
Dawson Geophysical Company
ZIM13.61-0.33
-2.37%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
WLMTF - BRDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
MOD - BRDCF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
SRI - BRDCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
DAN - BRDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

MOD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOD has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOD jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOD
1D Price
Change %
MOD100%
+1.83%
ATMU - MOD
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
ALSN - MOD
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
PHIN - MOD
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
DNZOY - MOD
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
BRDCY - MOD
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More