BRDCF
Price
$45.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.61B
SRI
Price
$7.62
Change
+$0.09 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
210.89M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs SRI

Header iconBRDCF vs SRI Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs SRIBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$45.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$186
Capitalization30.61B
Stoneridge
Price$7.62
Change+$0.09 (+1.20%)
Volume$159.19K
Capitalization210.89M
BRDCF vs SRI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. SRI commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Buy and SRI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $45.20 vs. SRI: $7.62)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and SRI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 117% vs. SRI: 60%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $30.61B vs. SRI: $210.89M
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $30.61B. SRI’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $210.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SRI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than SRI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SRI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the short-term than SRI.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.72% price change this week, while SRI (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -7.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($30.6B) has a higher market cap than SRI($211M). SRI has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: SRI (159.86) vs BRDCF (22.95). BRDCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.590 vs. SRI (21.531). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 698B vs. SRI (21.6M). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 698B vs. SRI (49.8M). SRI has less debt than BRDCF: SRI (172M) vs BRDCF (795B). BRDCF has higher revenues than SRI: BRDCF (4.37T) vs SRI (878M).
BRDCFSRIBRDCF / SRI
Capitalization30.6B211M14,502%
EBITDA698B21.6M3,231,481%
Gain YTD25.59021.531119%
P/E Ratio22.95159.8614%
Revenue4.37T878M497,722%
Total Cash698B49.8M1,401,606%
Total Debt795B172M462,209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs SRI: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
SRI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4858
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRI (89) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRI’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRI (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRI’s over the last 12 months.

SRI's SMR Rating (95) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (100) in the null industry. This means that SRI’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SRI (54) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRI (87) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFSRI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNTC13.990.29
+2.12%
Benitec Biopharma
CVLT193.032.73
+1.43%
Commvault Systems
NPACU10.28N/A
N/A
New Providence Acquisition Corp III
DWSN1.80-0.03
-1.64%
Dawson Geophysical Company
ZIM13.61-0.33
-2.37%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
WLMTF - BRDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
MOD - BRDCF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
SRI - BRDCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
DAN - BRDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More

SRI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRI has been loosely correlated with APTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRI jumps, then APTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRI
1D Price
Change %
SRI100%
+1.20%
APTV - SRI
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
VC - SRI
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
FOXF - SRI
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
LEA - SRI
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
THRM - SRI
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
More