BRDCF
Price
$32.86
Change
-$2.09 (-5.98%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
SRI
Price
$5.85
Change
+$0.03 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
500.92M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRDCF vs SRI

Header iconBRDCF vs SRI Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs SRIBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$32.86
Change-$2.09 (-5.98%)
Volume$17.61K
Capitalization28.65B
Stoneridge
Price$5.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.52%)
Volume$183.38K
Capitalization500.92M
BRDCF vs SRI Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. SRI commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Hold and SRI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $32.86 vs. SRI: $5.85)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and SRI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 858% vs. SRI: 53%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $28.65B vs. SRI: $500.92M
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $28.65B. SRI’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $500.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than SRI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SRI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDCF and SRI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while SRI (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($28.6B) has a higher market cap than SRI($501M). SRI has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: SRI (156.25) vs BRDCF (12.56). SRI YTD gains are higher at: -6.699 vs. BRDCF (-8.697). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. SRI (46M). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. SRI (40.8M). SRI has less debt than BRDCF: SRI (199M) vs BRDCF (802B). BRDCF has higher revenues than SRI: BRDCF (4.26T) vs SRI (976M).
BRDCFSRIBRDCF / SRI
Capitalization28.6B501M5,709%
EBITDA793B46M1,723,913%
Gain YTD-8.697-6.699130%
P/E Ratio12.56156.258%
Revenue4.26T976M436,783%
Total Cash526B40.8M1,289,216%
Total Debt802B199M403,015%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF vs SRI: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
SRI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRI (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRI’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRI (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SRI (90) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.

SRI's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BRDCF (76) in the null industry. This means that SRI’s stock grew similarly to BRDCF’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SRI (91) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that BRDCF’s stock grew similarly to SRI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFSRI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAFGX76.830.87
+1.15%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
PJARX11.040.05
+0.45%
Principal SmallCap Value II R3
CETAX11.940.05
+0.42%
Centerstone Investors A
MCECX12.260.05
+0.41%
Martin Currie Emerging Markets C
APHMX43.330.16
+0.37%
Artisan Mid Cap Institutional

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
-5.98%
WLMTF - BRDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
MOD - BRDCF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
SRI - BRDCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
DAN - BRDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More