BRDCF
Price
$44.27
Change
+$1.21 (+2.81%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
WLMTF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
317.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDCF vs WLMTF

Header iconBRDCF vs WLMTF Comparison
Open Charts BRDCF vs WLMTFBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$44.27
Change+$1.21 (+2.81%)
Volume$240
Capitalization28.65B
Wuling Motors Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization317.24M
BRDCF vs WLMTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCF vs. WLMTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCF is a Hold and WLMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCF: $44.27 vs. WLMTF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BRDCF and WLMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCF: 13% vs. WLMTF: 10%
Market capitalization -- BRDCF: $28.65B vs. WLMTF: $317.24M
BRDCF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $28.65B. WLMTF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $317.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the long-term than WLMTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WLMTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCF is a better buy in the short-term than WLMTF.

Price Growth

BRDCF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.81% price change this week, while WLMTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -11.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCF($28.6B) has a higher market cap than WLMTF($317M). WLMTF has higher P/E ratio than BRDCF: WLMTF (92.59) vs BRDCF (12.56). BRDCF YTD gains are higher at: 23.006 vs. WLMTF (12.613). BRDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. WLMTF (-26.91M). BRDCF has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. WLMTF (3.4B). WLMTF has less debt than BRDCF: WLMTF (2.79B) vs BRDCF (802B). BRDCF has higher revenues than WLMTF: BRDCF (4.26T) vs WLMTF (13.5B).
BRDCFWLMTFBRDCF / WLMTF
Capitalization28.6B317M9,022%
EBITDA793B-26.91M-2,946,969%
Gain YTD23.00612.613182%
P/E Ratio12.5692.5914%
Revenue4.26T13.5B31,578%
Total Cash526B3.4B15,489%
Total Debt802B2.79B28,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCF: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCFWLMTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAVA86.523.81
+4.61%
CAVA Group
AREB1.280.05
+4.07%
American Rebel Holdings Inc
TRML16.420.23
+1.42%
Tourmaline Bio
SCOR5.22N/A
N/A
comScore
ODP19.66-0.24
-1.21%
ODP Corp (The)

BRDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRDCF and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRDCF and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCF
1D Price
Change %
BRDCF100%
N/A
WLMTF - BRDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - BRDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MOD - BRDCF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
SRI - BRDCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
DAN - BRDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More

WLMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMTF and BRDCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMTF and BRDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMTF
1D Price
Change %
WLMTF100%
N/A
BRDCF - WLMTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNTHY - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NKRKF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHKGF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGAUF - WLMTF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More