BRDCY
Price
$19.98
Change
-$0.11 (-0.55%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
42 days until earnings call
GT
Price
$9.12
Change
+$0.18 (+2.01%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRDCY vs GT

Header iconBRDCY vs GT Comparison
Open Charts BRDCY vs GTBanner chart's image
Bridgestone
Price$19.98
Change-$0.11 (-0.55%)
Volume$40.22K
Capitalization28.65B
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.12
Change+$0.18 (+2.01%)
Volume$5.43M
Capitalization3.9B
BRDCY vs GT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDCY vs. GT commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDCY is a Hold and GT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDCY: $19.98 vs. GT: $9.12)
Brand notoriety: BRDCY: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDCY: 54% vs. GT: 93%
Market capitalization -- BRDCY: $28.65B vs. GT: $3.9B
BRDCY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $28.65B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDCY is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than BRDCY.

Price Growth

BRDCY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -4.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDCY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

GT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRDCY($28.6B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than BRDCY: GT (769.23) vs BRDCY (12.11). BRDCY YTD gains are higher at: 19.070 vs. GT (1.333). BRDCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793B vs. GT (856M). BRDCY has more cash in the bank: 526B vs. GT (902M). GT has less debt than BRDCY: GT (8.65B) vs BRDCY (802B). BRDCY has higher revenues than GT: BRDCY (4.26T) vs GT (20.1B).
BRDCYGTBRDCY / GT
Capitalization28.6B3.9B733%
EBITDA793B856M92,640%
Gain YTD19.0701.3331,430%
P/E Ratio12.11769.232%
Revenue4.26T20.1B21,209%
Total Cash526B902M58,315%
Total Debt802B8.65B9,273%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRDCY vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
BRDCY
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4197
SMR RATING
1..100
6489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRDCY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (77) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BRDCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (97) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BRDCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as GT (89) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BRDCY’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GT (57) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BRDCY’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

BRDCY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GT (50) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BRDCY’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDCYGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIVNX11.61N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R2
RAGTX53.41N/A
N/A
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology A
TRGAX19.54N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials I
OLVRX20.07N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R4
MNHWX24.73N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term W

BRDCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDCY has been loosely correlated with DNZOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDCY jumps, then DNZOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDCY
1D Price
Change %
BRDCY100%
-0.55%
DNZOY - BRDCY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
SMTOY - BRDCY
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
MOD - BRDCY
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
DAN - BRDCY
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
GT - BRDCY
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
More