BRDG
Price
$9.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
280.98M
17 days until earnings call
CG
Price
$39.03
Change
+$0.24 (+0.62%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.93B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRDG vs CG

Header iconBRDG vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs CGBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization280.98M
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$39.03
Change+$0.24 (+0.62%)
Volume$27.51K
Capitalization16.93B
BRDG vs CG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. CG commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Buy and CG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $9.38 vs. CG: $38.79)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 27% vs. CG: 47%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. CG: $16.93B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRDG and CG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

CG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.98% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). CG has higher P/E ratio than BRDG: CG (77.57) vs BRDG (26.30). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 13.011 vs. CG (-22.652). BRDG has less debt than CG: BRDG (484M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than BRDG: CG (1.32B) vs BRDG (391M).
BRDGCGBRDG / CG
Capitalization281M16.9B2%
EBITDA-36.42MN/A-
Gain YTD13.011-22.652-57%
P/E Ratio26.3077.5734%
Revenue391M1.32B30%
Total Cash77.5MN/A-
Total Debt484M9.26B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG: Fundamental Ratings
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALCBX11.460.01
+0.06%
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity C
GTMUX20.77N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R6
LAFVX18.07N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
WHGIX11.49N/A
N/A
Westwood Income Opportunity Instl
CCPAX12.86N/A
N/A
FS Chiron Capital Allocation A

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
+8.19%
APO - BRDG
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.35%
JHG - BRDG
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
BX - BRDG
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.94%
CG - BRDG
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.01%
IVZ - BRDG
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
More