BRDG
Price
$9.30
Change
-$0.45 (-4.62%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
280.98M
59 days until earnings call
JHG
Price
$36.15
Change
-$0.88 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDG vs JHG

Header iconBRDG vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs JHGBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.30
Change-$0.45 (-4.62%)
Volume$298K
Capitalization280.98M
Janus Henderson Group
Price$36.15
Change-$0.88 (-2.38%)
Volume$777.24K
Capitalization5.22B
BRDG vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. JHG commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and JHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $9.30 vs. JHG: $36.15)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 102% vs. JHG: 56%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. JHG: $5.22B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHG is a better buy in the long-term than BRDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the short-term than JHG.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHG($5.22B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). BRDG has higher P/E ratio than JHG: BRDG (26.30) vs JHG (13.66). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 12.047 vs. JHG (-13.301). JHG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 563M vs. BRDG (-36.42M). JHG has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. BRDG (77.5M). JHG has less debt than BRDG: JHG (382M) vs BRDG (484M). JHG has higher revenues than BRDG: JHG (2.1B) vs BRDG (391M).
BRDGJHGBRDG / JHG
Capitalization281M5.22B5%
EBITDA-36.42M563M-6%
Gain YTD12.047-13.301-91%
P/E Ratio26.3013.66193%
Revenue391M2.1B19%
Total Cash77.5M1.89B4%
Total Debt484M382M127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHG: Fundamental Ratings
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVMT15.05-0.09
-0.59%
Invesco Elctc vhcl Mtls Cmd StgyNoK-1ETF
JXI73.57-0.45
-0.61%
iShares Global Utilities ETF
CFA85.68-0.85
-0.98%
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
UDIV46.56-0.55
-1.16%
Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
MDYV77.62-1.15
-1.46%
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
-4.62%
APO - BRDG
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.34%
JHG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
CG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
BX - BRDG
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
TPG - BRDG
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.82%
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
-2.38%
IVZ - JHG
84%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
KKR - JHG
83%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
CG - JHG
82%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
BN - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
BX - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
More