BRDG
Price
$10.21
Change
+$0.12 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
280.98M
38 days until earnings call
PGPHF
Price
$1330.83
Change
+$51.38 (+4.02%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRDG vs PGPHF

Header iconBRDG vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$10.21
Change+$0.12 (+1.19%)
Volume$148.85K
Capitalization280.98M
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1330.83
Change+$51.38 (+4.02%)
Volume$2
Capitalization29.13B
BRDG vs PGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. PGPHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and PGPHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $10.21 vs. PGPHF: $1330.83)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 44% vs. PGPHF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. PGPHF: $29.13B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGPHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the short-term than PGPHF.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

PGPHF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGPHF($29.1B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). BRDG (26.30) and PGPHF (25.71) have similar P/E ratio . BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 23.010 vs. PGPHF (0.420). PGPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. BRDG (-36.42M). PGPHF has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. BRDG (77.5M). BRDG has less debt than PGPHF: BRDG (484M) vs PGPHF (1.13B). PGPHF has higher revenues than BRDG: PGPHF (2.33B) vs BRDG (391M).
BRDGPGPHFBRDG / PGPHF
Capitalization281M29.1B1%
EBITDA-36.42M1.57B-2%
Gain YTD23.0100.4205,475%
P/E Ratio26.3025.71102%
Revenue391M2.33B17%
Total Cash77.5M307M25%
Total Debt484M1.13B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDGPGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNK44.250.96
+2.22%
Teekay Tankers Ltd
ATLC57.640.73
+1.28%
Atlanticus Holdings Corp
PR14.06-0.11
-0.78%
Permian Resources Corp
ISPC0.99-0.01
-1.00%
iSpecimen Inc
KBSX1.69-0.03
-1.74%
FST Corp

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
+2.20%
APO - BRDG
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
JHG - BRDG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
CG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
BX - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
KKR - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
+4.02%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More