BRDG
Price
$7.63
Change
-$1.10 (-12.60%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
280.98M
38 days until earnings call
PGPHF
Price
$1328.48
Change
-$78.11 (-5.55%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.13B
Ad is loading...

BRDG vs PGPHF

Header iconBRDG vs PGPHF Comparison
Open Charts BRDG vs PGPHFBanner chart's image
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$7.63
Change-$1.10 (-12.60%)
Volume$558
Capitalization280.98M
Partners Group Holding Zug Namen-Akt
Price$1328.48
Change-$78.11 (-5.55%)
Volume$19
Capitalization29.13B
BRDG vs PGPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRDG vs. PGPHF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRDG is a Hold and PGPHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BRDG: $8.73 vs. PGPHF: $1328.48)
Brand notoriety: BRDG and PGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRDG: 189% vs. PGPHF: 33%
Market capitalization -- BRDG: $280.98M vs. PGPHF: $29.13B
BRDG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $280.98M. PGPHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRDG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the long-term than PGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRDG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BRDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BRDG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -12.53% price change this week, while PGPHF (@Investment Managers) price change was -10.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRDG is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGPHF($29.1B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). BRDG (26.30) and PGPHF (25.71) have similar P/E ratio . BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 5.179 vs. PGPHF (0.243). PGPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.57B vs. BRDG (-36.42M). PGPHF has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. BRDG (77.5M). BRDG has less debt than PGPHF: BRDG (484M) vs PGPHF (1.13B). PGPHF has higher revenues than BRDG: PGPHF (2.33B) vs BRDG (391M).
BRDGPGPHFBRDG / PGPHF
Capitalization281M29.1B1%
EBITDA-36.42M1.57B-2%
Gain YTD5.1790.2432,129%
P/E Ratio26.3025.71102%
Revenue391M2.33B17%
Total Cash77.5M307M25%
Total Debt484M1.13B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
PGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWOCX13.72N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Research Growth C
CFWCX24.63N/A
N/A
Calvert Global Water C
IVRTX28.50N/A
N/A
VY® CBRE Real Estate S2
SSGSX43.60N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
FSYMX9.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq M

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
-11.82%
JHG - BRDG
46%
Loosely correlated
-11.05%
CG - BRDG
45%
Loosely correlated
-16.41%
BX - BRDG
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.86%
APO - BRDG
43%
Loosely correlated
-12.77%
IVZ - BRDG
42%
Loosely correlated
-11.85%
More

PGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGPHF and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGPHF and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGPHF
1D Price
Change %
PGPHF100%
-5.55%
BRDG - PGPHF
31%
Poorly correlated
-11.82%
BLK - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.71%
BN - PGPHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
BAM - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
IVZ - PGPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-11.85%
More