Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs EWZS
BRF vs EWZS Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs EWZS
BRF vs EWZS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. EWZS commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and EWZS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWZS has more net assets: 241M vs. BRF (22M). EWZS has a higher annual dividend yield than BRF: EWZS (6.027) vs BRF (4.019). BRF was incepted earlier than EWZS: BRF (17 years) vs EWZS (16 years). EWZS (0.59) and BRF (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . EWZS has a higher turnover BRF (43.00) vs BRF (43.00).
| BRF | EWZS | BRF / EWZS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.019 | 6.027 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 22M | 241M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.59 | 102% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 82.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 5.57 | 4.00 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | EWZS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +2.96% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.91% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| LGO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| SLVM - BRF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
EWZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWZS has been closely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWZS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EWZS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZS | 100% | +2.88% | ||
| INTR - EWZS | 71% Closely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| STNE - EWZS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| VINP - EWZS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PAX - EWZS | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.80% | ||
| SGML - EWZS | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.01% | ||
More | ||||