Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$14.78
Change-$0.25 (-1.66%)
Volume$956
Net Assets19.52M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$21.02
Change-$0.15 (-0.71%)
Volume$3.75K
Net Assets33.81M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 33.8M vs. BRF (19.5M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (34.368) vs FLLA (27.479). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 34.368 | 27.479 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 19.5M | 33.8M | 58% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 3.10 | 5.67 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.54% |