Ad is loading...
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$12.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Volume$3.89K
Net Assets16.64M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$19.67
Change+$0.24 (+1.24%)
Volume$122
Net Assets29.33M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Apr 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 29.3M vs. BRF (16.6M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (16.023) vs FLLA (14.992). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (6 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.70). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (8.97) vs FLLA (8.97).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 16.023 | 14.992 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 16.6M | 29.3M | 57% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.19 | 368% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 8.97 | 479% |
| Yield | 3.81 | 6.49 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with AZUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then AZUL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.16% |