Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$16.53
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.48K
Net Assets22.66M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$23.95
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
Volume$9.99K
Net Assets43.6M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLLA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 43.6M vs. BRF (22.7M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (50.326) vs FLLA (45.237). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (17 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 50.326 | 45.237 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 43.6M | 52% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 14.31 | 210% |
| Yield | 2.74 | 4.88 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| CBDBY - BRF | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.66% | ||
| LGO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| BRFS - BRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFYA - BRF | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| ACGP - FLLA | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.66% |