Ad is loading...
BRF vs FLLA
BRF vs FLLA Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLLA
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$13.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.18K
Net Assets17.77M
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Volume$200
Net Assets30.9M
BRF vs FLLA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLLA commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a StrongBuy and FLLA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLLA has more net assets: 30.9M vs. BRF (17.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: BRF (24.350) vs FLLA (22.833). BRF was incepted earlier than FLLA: BRF (16 years) vs FLLA (7 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.70). BRF has a higher turnover FLLA (8.97) vs FLLA (8.97).
| BRF | FLLA | BRF / FLLA | |
| Gain YTD | 24.350 | 22.833 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 17.8M | 30.9M | 58% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.19 | 368% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 8.97 | 479% |
| Yield | 3.51 | 6.14 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 51% Loosely correlated | -26.54% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
More | ||||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.30% |