BRKCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.61M
NLIBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
62.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKCF vs NLIBF

Header iconBRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts BRKCF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Barksdale Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300.68K
Capitalization8.61M
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.21
Change-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization62.55M
BRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKCF vs. NLIBF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKCF is a StrongBuy and NLIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKCF: $0.06 vs. NLIBF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: BRKCF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKCF: 168% vs. NLIBF: 190%
Market capitalization -- BRKCF: $8.61M vs. NLIBF: $62.55M
BRKCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.61M. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $62.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRKCF is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NLIBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRKCF is a better buy in the short-term than NLIBF.

Price Growth

BRKCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +320.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($62.5M) has a higher market cap than BRKCF($8.61M). NLIBF YTD gains are higher at: 19.444 vs. BRKCF (-45.733). BRKCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.75M vs. NLIBF (-19.63M). NLIBF has more cash in the bank: 3.33M vs. BRKCF (661K). NLIBF has less debt than BRKCF: NLIBF (2.03K) vs BRKCF (1.69M). BRKCF (0) and NLIBF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRKCFNLIBFBRKCF / NLIBF
Capitalization8.61M62.5M14%
EBITDA-3.75M-19.63M19%
Gain YTD-45.73319.444-235%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash661K3.33M20%
Total Debt1.69M2.03K83,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKCF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKCFNLIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APOG45.331.55
+3.54%
Apogee Enterprises
RCKY29.750.33
+1.12%
Rocky Brands
CMI418.044.00
+0.97%
Cummins
BRBR36.800.16
+0.44%
BellRing Brands
GFAI1.12-0.01
-0.88%
Guardforce AI Co Limited

BRKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKCF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKCF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKCF
1D Price
Change %
BRKCF100%
+11.02%
NLIBF - BRKCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNTRF - BRKCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-14.00%
BRYGF - BRKCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - BRKCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
GRDAF - BRKCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.71%
More