BRKCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.81M
NLIBF
Price
$0.27
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
58.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKCF vs NLIBF

Header iconBRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts BRKCF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Barksdale Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$321.21K
Capitalization7.81M
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.27
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization58.97M
BRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKCF vs. NLIBF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKCF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKCF: $0.06 vs. NLIBF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: BRKCF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKCF: 207% vs. NLIBF: 228%
Market capitalization -- BRKCF: $7.81M vs. NLIBF: $58.97M
BRKCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.81M. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $58.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRKCF and NLIBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NLIBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the short-term than BRKCF.

Price Growth

BRKCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($59M) has a higher market cap than BRKCF($7.81M). NLIBF YTD gains are higher at: 47.222 vs. BRKCF (-50.776). BRKCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.75M vs. NLIBF (-19.09M). NLIBF has more cash in the bank: 6.64M vs. BRKCF (661K). NLIBF has less debt than BRKCF: NLIBF (4.82K) vs BRKCF (1.69M). BRKCF (0) and NLIBF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BRKCFNLIBFBRKCF / NLIBF
Capitalization7.81M59M13%
EBITDA-3.75M-19.09M20%
Gain YTD-50.77647.222-108%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash661K6.64M10%
Total Debt1.69M4.82K35,145%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKCF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKCFNLIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBIA76.25N/A
N/A
Hills Bancorporation
CTOWY10.33N/A
N/A
China Tower Corporation Limited
HROEY13.30N/A
N/A
Hirose Electric
GDTRF0.73-0.02
-3.00%
Gladiator Metals Corp.
BOREF1.22-0.48
-28.24%
Borealis Exploration Limited

BRKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKCF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKCF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKCF
1D Price
Change %
BRKCF100%
-4.83%
NLIBF - BRKCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNTRF - BRKCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRYGF - BRKCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - BRKCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRDAF - BRKCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
More