BRKCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
34.27M
NLIBF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
39.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKCF vs NLIBF

Header iconBRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison
Open Charts BRKCF vs NLIBFBanner chart's image
Barksdale Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization34.27M
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization39.06M
BRKCF vs NLIBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKCF vs. NLIBF commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKCF is a Hold and NLIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKCF: $0.07 vs. NLIBF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: BRKCF and NLIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKCF: 8% vs. NLIBF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BRKCF: $34.27M vs. NLIBF: $39.06M
BRKCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $34.27M. NLIBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $39.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNLIBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRKCF and NLIBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BRKCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +38.45% price change this week, while NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than BRKCF($34.3M). NLIBF YTD gains are higher at: 63.000 vs. BRKCF (-38.534). NLIBF has more cash in the bank: 3.88M vs. BRKCF (3.27M).
BRKCFNLIBFBRKCF / NLIBF
Capitalization34.3M39.1M88%
EBITDA-2.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-38.53463.000-61%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash3.27M3.88M84%
Total Debt1.52MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKCF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEI5.880.05
+0.86%
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
DFIP41.440.10
+0.24%
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Sec ETF
RNRG9.57N/A
N/A
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
GGT4.07-0.01
-0.12%
THE Gabelli Multimedia Trust
INDA54.80-0.53
-0.96%
iShares MSCI India ETF

BRKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKCF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKCF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKCF
1D Price
Change %
BRKCF100%
+3.57%
NLIBF - BRKCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNNLF - BRKCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
BNTRF - BRKCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
BRYGF - BRKCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - BRKCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-32.74%
More