BRKL
Price
$10.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
885.39M
61 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$18.89
Change
-$0.07 (-0.37%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKL vs SFNC

Header iconBRKL vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts BRKL vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Brookline Ban
Price$10.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization885.39M
Simmons First National
Price$18.89
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
Volume$369.74K
Capitalization2.42B
BRKL vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKL vs. SFNC commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKL is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKL: $10.56 vs. SFNC: $18.96)
Brand notoriety: BRKL and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKL: 106% vs. SFNC: 83%
Market capitalization -- BRKL: $885.39M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
BRKL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $885.39M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRKL is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRKL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRKL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRKL is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

BRKL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.56% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRKL is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.94% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than BRKL($885M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than BRKL: SFNC (13.98) vs BRKL (11.41). BRKL YTD gains are higher at: -8.367 vs. SFNC (-13.928). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. BRKL (34.5M). SFNC has less debt than BRKL: SFNC (1.34B) vs BRKL (1.41B). SFNC has higher revenues than BRKL: SFNC (782M) vs BRKL (371M).
BRKLSFNCBRKL / SFNC
Capitalization885M2.42B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.367-13.92860%
P/E Ratio11.4113.9882%
Revenue371M782M47%
Total Cash34.5M345M10%
Total Debt1.41B1.34B105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKL vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
BRKL
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7875
SMR RATING
1..100
1009
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRKL's Valuation (24) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (25) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BRKL’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BRKL (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to BRKL’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRKL (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew significantly faster than BRKL’s over the last 12 months.

BRKL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (58) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BRKL’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

BRKL's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (25) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BRKL’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRKLSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIEAX13.49N/A
N/A
MM S&P 500® Index R4
ACEIX10.37N/A
N/A
Invesco Equity and Income A
MSVNX6.83N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Val R3
WEMAX9.49N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Growth A
SDYAX16.81N/A
N/A
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation F (SIMT)

BRKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRKL has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRKL jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKL
1D Price
Change %
BRKL100%
N/A
BHLB - BRKL
92%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
UBSI - BRKL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
HWC - BRKL
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
SFNC - BRKL
88%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
SBCF - BRKL
88%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-0.37%
UBSI - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
UCB - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
SBCF - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
HOPE - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
N/A
BHLB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More