BRLS vs MUSLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLS is a Sell and MUSLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BRLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MUSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BRLS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while MUSLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -10.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BRLS | MUSLF | BRLS / MUSLF | |
| Capitalization | 125M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -44.828 | -73.587 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WELNX | 9.23 | -0.02 | -0.22% |
| William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs N | |||
| FAAIX | 28.67 | -0.26 | -0.90% |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% I | |||
| NUGAX | 36.64 | -0.37 | -1.00% |
| Nuveen Global Dividend Growth A | |||
| GPGIX | 3.53 | -0.04 | -1.12% |
| Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Instl | |||
| JIGAX | 86.42 | -1.77 | -2.01% |
| JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity A | |||
BRLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLS and HAIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLS and HAIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRLS | 100% | N/A | ||
| HAIN - BRLS | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.54% | ||
| DDC - BRLS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| MDLZ - BRLS | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.63% | ||
| HSY - BRLS | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.48% | ||
| BON - BRLS | 6% Poorly correlated | +5.37% | ||
More | ||||
MUSLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MUSLF and NGRBF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MUSLF and NGRBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUSLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUSLF | 100% | +5.74% | ||
| NGRBF - MUSLF | 8% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
| BOF - MUSLF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BRLS - MUSLF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLG - MUSLF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| NBND - MUSLF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||