BRLT
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.08 (-2.79%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
41.25M
61 days until earnings call
LVMHF
Price
$581.99
Change
-$1.86 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
287.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRLT vs LVMHF

Header iconBRLT vs LVMHF Comparison
Open Charts BRLT vs LVMHFBanner chart's image
Brilliant Earth Group
Price$2.79
Change-$0.08 (-2.79%)
Volume$271.34K
Capitalization41.25M
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$581.99
Change-$1.86 (-0.32%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization287.39B
BRLT vs LVMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRLT vs. LVMHF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRLT is a Buy and LVMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BRLT: $2.79 vs. LVMHF: $581.99)
Brand notoriety: BRLT and LVMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRLT: 18% vs. LVMHF: 29%
Market capitalization -- BRLT: $41.25M vs. LVMHF: $287.39B
BRLT [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $41.25M. LVMHF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $287.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $287.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRLT is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVMHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRLT is a better buy in the short-term than LVMHF.

Price Growth

BRLT (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.77% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($287B) has a higher market cap than BRLT($41.2M). BRLT has higher P/E ratio than LVMHF: BRLT (50.67) vs LVMHF (22.69). BRLT YTD gains are higher at: 49.114 vs. LVMHF (-11.377). LVMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. BRLT (7.71M). BRLT has less debt than LVMHF: BRLT (98.5M) vs LVMHF (39.6B). LVMHF has higher revenues than BRLT: LVMHF (82.8B) vs BRLT (422M).
BRLTLVMHFBRLT / LVMHF
Capitalization41.2M287B0%
EBITDA7.71M25.5B0%
Gain YTD49.114-11.377-432%
P/E Ratio50.6722.69223%
Revenue422M82.8B1%
Total CashN/A12.3B-
Total Debt98.5M39.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVMHF: Fundamental Ratings
LVMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRLTLVMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BASE24.44N/A
N/A
Couchbase
MSA170.46-1.85
-1.07%
Mine Safety
LMNR15.77-0.19
-1.19%
Limoneira Co
MS148.09-2.44
-1.62%
Morgan Stanley
ZEO1.34-0.23
-14.65%
Zeo Energy Corp

BRLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRLT and SIG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRLT and SIG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLT
1D Price
Change %
BRLT100%
-2.96%
SIG - BRLT
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%
FOSL - BRLT
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.23%
CFRUY - BRLT
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
LVMHF - BRLT
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
HESAF - BRLT
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
More

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
-0.32%
LVMUY - LVMHF
98%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
CFRUY - LVMHF
77%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
More