It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BROG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BROG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BROG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +90.79% price change this week, while LPG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.18%.
BROG is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
LPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
BROG | LPG | BROG / LPG | |
Capitalization | 238M | 1.66B | 14% |
EBITDA | 27.5M | 428M | 6% |
Gain YTD | 70.064 | -2.665 | -2,629% |
P/E Ratio | 3.14 | 5.42 | 58% |
Revenue | 42.2M | 553M | 8% |
Total Cash | 28.7M | 208M | 14% |
Total Debt | 280M | 818M | 34% |
BROG | LPG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPG's Valuation (9) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for BROG (89) in the null industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew significantly faster than BROG’s over the last 12 months.
LPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BROG (100) in the null industry. This means that LPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BROG’s over the last 12 months.
BROG's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LPG (73) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BROG’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.
BROG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LPG (58) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BROG’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.
BROG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LPG (11) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BROG’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.
BROG | LPG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 6 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago76% | 10 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BROG and EE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BROG and EE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BROG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BROG | 100% | -7.93% | ||
EE - BROG | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
MARPS - BROG | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.71% | ||
IMPPP - BROG | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
LPG - BROG | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
IMPP - BROG | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.32% | ||
More |