FRO
Price
$41.21
Change
+$0.69 (+1.70%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
9.17B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LPG
Price
$47.37
Change
+$1.74 (+3.81%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRO vs LPG

FRO vs LPG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRO vs. LPG commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRO is a Buy and LPG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FRO: $41.21 vs. LPG: $47.37)
Brand notoriety: FRO and LPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRO: 48% vs. LPG: 57%
Market capitalization -- FRO: $9.17B vs. LPG: $2.03B
FRO [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $9.17B. LPG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $2.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $110.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LPG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the long-term than LPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the short-term than LPG.

Price Growth

FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.70% price change this week, while LPG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +7.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

LPG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+7.24% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($9.17B) has a higher market cap than LPG($2.03B). FRO has higher P/E ratio than LPG: FRO (10.15) vs LPG (6.28). LPG (108.512) and FRO (103.343) have similar YTD gains . FRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. LPG (292M). LPG has less debt than FRO: LPG (710M) vs FRO (2.63B). FRO has higher revenues than LPG: FRO (2.25B) vs LPG (482M).
FROLPGFRO / LPG
Capitalization9.17B2.03B453%
EBITDA1.12B292M383%
Gain YTD103.343108.51295%
P/E Ratio10.156.28162%
Revenue2.25B482M467%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.63B710M371%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRO vs LPG: Fundamental Ratings
FRO
LPG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3586
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1231
SMR RATING
1..100
2950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LPG's Valuation (2) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (3). This means that LPG’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (31). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's SMR Rating (29) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (50). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (38). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPG (99). This means that FRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FROLPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGDJ91.281.06
+1.17%
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
ABLD32.480.24
+0.75%
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
RAAR51.180.03
+0.06%
Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA Clo Reinvesting ETF
DUKH23.84-0.01
-0.06%
Ocean Park High Income ETF
IHE102.66-0.33
-0.32%
iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
+1.70%
DHT - FRO
86%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
TNK - FRO
83%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
INSW - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+2.00%
TEN - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
TK - FRO
79%
Closely correlated
+3.23%
More