BROS
Price
$68.06
Change
+$3.16 (+4.87%)
Updated
May 23, 03:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.69B
75 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$100.74
Change
-$0.76 (-0.75%)
Updated
May 23, 02:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
417.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs NATH

Header iconBROS vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs NATHBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$68.06
Change+$3.16 (+4.87%)
Volume$2.93K
Capitalization8.69B
Nathan's Famous
Price$100.74
Change-$0.76 (-0.75%)
Volume$100
Capitalization417.58M
BROS vs NATH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. NATH commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a Hold and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $64.90 vs. NATH: $101.50)
Brand notoriety: BROS and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 1% vs. NATH: 3%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $8.69B vs. NATH: $417.58M
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.69B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $417.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than BROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than BROS.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а -9.40% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.99% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($8.69B) has a higher market cap than NATH($418M). BROS has higher P/E ratio than NATH: BROS (175.54) vs NATH (17.61). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 29.776 vs. BROS (23.902). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 210M vs. NATH (38.2M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. NATH (23.7M). NATH has less debt than BROS: NATH (56.8M) vs BROS (1.02B). BROS has higher revenues than NATH: BROS (1.36B) vs NATH (146M).
BROSNATHBROS / NATH
Capitalization8.69B418M2,079%
EBITDA210M38.2M550%
Gain YTD23.90229.77680%
P/E Ratio175.5417.61997%
Revenue1.36B146M932%
Total Cash316M23.7M1,333%
Total Debt1.02B56.8M1,798%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUSL102.640.14
+0.13%
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
VPL77.40N/A
N/A
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
BJAN48.03-0.04
-0.07%
Innovator US Equity Buff ETF™ Jan
JEQ6.95-0.03
-0.43%
abrdn Japan Equity Fund
EWK21.66-0.12
-0.54%
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with PZZA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then PZZA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
N/A
PZZA - NATH
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
LOCO - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
PBPB - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BROS - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More