BROS
Price
$70.27
Change
+$12.48 (+21.60%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
8.92B
89 days until earnings call
NATH
Price
$98.05
Change
-$1.20 (-1.21%)
Updated
Aug 8, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
405.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BROS vs NATH

Header iconBROS vs NATH Comparison
Open Charts BROS vs NATHBanner chart's image
Dutch Bros
Price$70.27
Change+$12.48 (+21.60%)
Volume$13.97M
Capitalization8.92B
Nathan's Famous
Price$98.05
Change-$1.20 (-1.21%)
Volume$879
Capitalization405.88M
BROS vs NATH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BROS vs. NATH commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BROS is a StrongBuy and NATH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BROS: $70.27 vs. NATH: $99.25)
Brand notoriety: BROS and NATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BROS: 485% vs. NATH: 44%
Market capitalization -- BROS: $8.92B vs. NATH: $405.88M
BROS [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.92B. NATH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $405.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BROS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BROS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than BROS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BROS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BROS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than BROS.

Price Growth

BROS (@Restaurants) experienced а +18.56% price change this week, while NATH (@Restaurants) price change was +4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BROS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BROS($8.92B) has a higher market cap than NATH($406M). BROS has higher P/E ratio than NATH: BROS (152.76) vs NATH (16.91). BROS YTD gains are higher at: 34.154 vs. NATH (27.481). BROS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 210M vs. NATH (37.8M). BROS has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. NATH (7.71M). NATH has less debt than BROS: NATH (56.8M) vs BROS (1.02B). BROS has higher revenues than NATH: BROS (1.36B) vs NATH (148M).
BROSNATHBROS / NATH
Capitalization8.92B406M2,197%
EBITDA210M37.8M556%
Gain YTD34.15427.481124%
P/E Ratio152.7616.91903%
Revenue1.36B148M920%
Total Cash316M7.71M4,098%
Total Debt1.02B56.8M1,798%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BROSNATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BROS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCMGX20.72N/A
N/A
OCM Gold Investor
AAAQX12.37N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Assets R
MLXCX28.33N/A
N/A
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure C
ETNDX19.37N/A
N/A
Eventide Dividend Growth N
RWMHX64.26-0.13
-0.20%
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E

BROS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BROS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BROS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BROS
1D Price
Change %
BROS100%
+21.60%
FRSH - BROS
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
CAVA - BROS
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
SHAK - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
CMG - BROS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FWRG - BROS
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.52%
More

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-1.59%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
PZZA - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+8.59%
BROS - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+21.60%
LOCO - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
KRUS - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More