BRPHF
Price
$20.70
Change
+$0.70 (+3.50%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
73 days until earnings call
MARA
Price
$19.91
Change
+$1.61 (+8.80%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.04B
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BRPHF vs MARA

Header iconBRPHF vs MARA Comparison
Open Charts BRPHF vs MARABanner chart's image
Galaxy Digital Holdings
Price$20.70
Change+$0.70 (+3.50%)
Volume$326.36K
Capitalization1.17B
MARA Holdings
Price$19.91
Change+$1.61 (+8.80%)
Volume$88.41M
Capitalization6.04B
BRPHF vs MARA Comparison Chart
Loading...
BRPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRPHF vs. MARA commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRPHF is a Hold and MARA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BRPHF: $20.70 vs. MARA: $19.91)
Brand notoriety: BRPHF and MARA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRPHF: 157% vs. MARA: 137%
Market capitalization -- BRPHF: $1.17B vs. MARA: $6.04B
BRPHF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.17B. MARA’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $6.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRPHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMARA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MARA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRPHF is a better buy in the long-term than MARA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRPHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MARA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRPHF is a better buy in the short-term than MARA.

Price Growth

BRPHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +10.64% price change this week, while MARA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +11.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BRPHF is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.

MARA is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MARA($6.04B) has a higher market cap than BRPHF($1.17B). MARA has higher P/E ratio than BRPHF: MARA (20.41) vs BRPHF (2.85). BRPHF (19.377) and MARA (18.724) have similar YTD gains . MARA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 467M vs. BRPHF (-2.16M). MARA has more cash in the bank: 357M vs. BRPHF (833K). MARA has less debt than BRPHF: MARA (326M) vs BRPHF (733M). MARA has higher revenues than BRPHF: MARA (388M) vs BRPHF (0).
BRPHFMARABRPHF / MARA
Capitalization1.17B6.04B19%
EBITDA-2.16M467M-0%
Gain YTD19.37718.724103%
P/E Ratio2.8520.4114%
Revenue0388M-
Total Cash833K357M0%
Total Debt733M326M225%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRPHF vs MARA: Fundamental Ratings
BRPHF
MARA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4770
SMR RATING
1..100
1775
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
664
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRPHF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARA (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARA’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MARA (70) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew similarly to MARA’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARA (75) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARA’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MARA (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew similarly to MARA’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARA (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRPHFMARA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BRPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DON52.430.35
+0.67%
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF
FEDM48.640.25
+0.51%
FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr
FBY19.080.08
+0.42%
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF
JSCP46.700.01
+0.02%
JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF
JHID27.83N/A
N/A
JHancock International High Dividend ETF

BRPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRPHF has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRPHF jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRPHF
1D Price
Change %
BRPHF100%
+3.49%
COIN - BRPHF
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.92%
HIVE - BRPHF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
HUT - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
RIOT - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
MARA - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
+8.80%
More

MARA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARA has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MARA jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARA
1D Price
Change %
MARA100%
+8.80%
RIOT - MARA
84%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
CLSK - MARA
81%
Closely correlated
+6.17%
BITF - MARA
76%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
BTBT - MARA
74%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
HIVE - MARA
72%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
More