BRRDF
Price
$17.40
Change
+$1.62 (+10.27%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
CANOF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRRDF vs CANOF

Header iconBRRDF vs CANOF Comparison
Open Charts BRRDF vs CANOFBanner chart's image
Borregaard ASA
Price$17.40
Change+$1.62 (+10.27%)
Volume$132
Capitalization2.07B
California Nanotechnologies
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.56K
Capitalization10.49M
BRRDF vs CANOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRRDF vs. CANOF commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRRDF is a Hold and CANOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BRRDF: $17.40 vs. CANOF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: BRRDF and CANOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRRDF: 100% vs. CANOF: 17%
Market capitalization -- BRRDF: $2.07B vs. CANOF: $10.49M
BRRDF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.07B. CANOF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $10.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $224.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRRDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCANOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CANOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRRDF is a better buy in the long-term than CANOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CANOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BRRDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CANOF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +10.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.13% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRRDF($2.07B) has a higher market cap than CANOF($10.5M). CANOF has higher P/E ratio than BRRDF: CANOF (196.27) vs BRRDF (21.90). BRRDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CANOF (-56.334). BRRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.91B vs. CANOF (-340.99K). BRRDF has more cash in the bank: 96M vs. CANOF (463K). CANOF has less debt than BRRDF: CANOF (1.55M) vs BRRDF (2.45B). BRRDF has higher revenues than CANOF: BRRDF (7.66B) vs CANOF (5.19M).
BRRDFCANOFBRRDF / CANOF
Capitalization2.07B10.5M19,695%
EBITDA1.91B-340.99K-561,300%
Gain YTD0.000-56.334-
P/E Ratio21.90196.2711%
Revenue7.66B5.19M147,515%
Total Cash96M463K20,734%
Total Debt2.45B1.55M158,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRRDF vs CANOF: Fundamental Ratings
BRRDF
CANOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5684
SMR RATING
1..100
9199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7295
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRRDF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANOF (92). This means that BRRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

BRRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (84). This means that BRRDF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

BRRDF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (99). This means that BRRDF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

BRRDF's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CANOF (95). This means that BRRDF’s stock grew similarly to CANOF’s over the last 12 months.

CANOF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRRDF (34). This means that CANOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRRDFCANOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRLSX9.600.02
+0.21%
Hartford Real Asset R4
JERTX12.400.01
+0.08%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate T
RIVHX19.59-0.11
-0.56%
American Funds International Vntg R-2E
VQNPX69.28-0.46
-0.66%
Vanguard Growth & Income Inv
NWCAX60.46-0.83
-1.35%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A

BRRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRRDF and BLGO have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRRDF and BLGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRRDF
1D Price
Change %
BRRDF100%
N/A
BLGO - BRRDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CLZNY - BRRDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
CGIFF - BRRDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
BNTGY - BRRDF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
BNTGF - BRRDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CANOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANOF and CGIFF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANOF and CGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANOF
1D Price
Change %
CANOF100%
-0.43%
CGIFF - CANOF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CLZNY - CANOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
BNTGY - CANOF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
COIHY - CANOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BRRDF - CANOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More