BRRDF
Price
$18.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CGIFF
Price
$10.03
Change
+$0.10 (+1.01%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRRDF vs CGIFF

Header iconBRRDF vs CGIFF Comparison
Open Charts BRRDF vs CGIFFBanner chart's image
Borregaard ASA
Price$18.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.49K
Capitalization1.83B
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
Price$10.03
Change+$0.10 (+1.01%)
Volume$2.99K
Capitalization1.14B
BRRDF vs CGIFF Comparison Chart in %
BRRDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRRDF vs. CGIFF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRRDF is a Hold and CGIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BRRDF: $18.30 vs. CGIFF: $9.85)
Brand notoriety: BRRDF and CGIFF are both not notable
BRRDF represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while CGIFF is part of the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRRDF: 154% vs. CGIFF: 74%
Market capitalization -- BRRDF: $1.83B vs. CGIFF: $1.14B
BRRDF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $1.83B. CGIFF’s [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $192.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $56.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $6.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRRDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGIFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BRRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGIFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGIFF is a better buy in the long-term than BRRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGIFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CGIFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRRDF is a better buy in the short-term than CGIFF.

Price Growth

BRRDF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CGIFF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -9.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.49% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-2.77% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRRDF($1.83B) has a higher market cap than CGIFF($1.14B). BRRDF has higher P/E ratio than CGIFF: BRRDF (22.23) vs CGIFF (14.42). CGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 30.291 vs. BRRDF (5.172). BRRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. CGIFF (434M). BRRDF has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. CGIFF (20.1M). CGIFF has less debt than BRRDF: CGIFF (1.03B) vs BRRDF (2.29B). BRRDF has higher revenues than CGIFF: BRRDF (7.51B) vs CGIFF (1.88B).
BRRDFCGIFFBRRDF / CGIFF
Capitalization1.83B1.14B160%
EBITDA1.83B434M422%
Gain YTD5.17230.29117%
P/E Ratio22.2314.42154%
Revenue7.51B1.88B399%
Total Cash212M20.1M1,055%
Total Debt2.29B1.03B222%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRRDF vs CGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
BRRDF
CGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5612
SMR RATING
1..100
8848
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGIFF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRDF (42). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRRDF (56). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRRDF (88). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRDF (53). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CGIFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRDF (31). This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to BRRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRRDFCGIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRRDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CGIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLAAX10.810.06
+0.56%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class A
OPMCX19.990.02
+0.10%
Invesco Main Street Mid Cap C
HSLAX40.00N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
DRRIX16.78-0.01
-0.06%
BNY Mellon Global Real Return - I
JEUIX17.47-0.03
-0.17%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq I

BRRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRRDF and BLGO have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRRDF and BLGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRRDF
1D Price
Change %
BRRDF100%
N/A
BLGO - BRRDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
CLZNY - BRRDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
CGIFF - BRRDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
BNTGY - BRRDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BNTGF - BRRDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIFF has been loosely correlated with ECVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIFF jumps, then ECVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGIFF
1D Price
Change %
CGIFF100%
-1.80%
ECVT - CGIFF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
CE - CGIFF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
HWKN - CGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
PRM - CGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
AVNT - CGIFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More