Advertisement
BRRLY vs BYCBF
To understand the difference between Barry Callebaut AG - ADR (BRRLY) vs. Barry Callebaut AG (BYCBF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRRLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBYCBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BRRLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BYCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRRLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BYCBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRRLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BYCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BRRLY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while BYCBF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.64%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.16% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BRRLY | BYCBF | BRRLY / BYCBF | |
| Capitalization | 7.69B | 7.69B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 728M | 728M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 11.043 | 1.272 | 868% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.70 | 41.66 | 105% |
| Revenue | 13B | 13B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 1.61B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 7.72B | 7.72B | 100% |
BRRLY | BYCBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BYCBF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (38). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (100). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (96). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (45). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
BYCBF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BRRLY (14). This means that BYCBF’s stock grew similarly to BRRLY’s over the last 12 months.
| BRRLY | BYCBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 27% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEDM | 56.42 | 0.25 | +0.44% |
| FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr | |||
| IMCB | 82.44 | -0.05 | -0.06% |
| iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| GROZ | 28.01 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Zacks Focus Growth ETF | |||
| USSE | 32.63 | -0.14 | -0.43% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF | |||
| JETU | 23.93 | -1.16 | -4.63% |
| MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
BRRLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRRLY and AJINF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRRLY and AJINF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRRLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRRLY | 100% | +3.58% | ||
| AJINF - BRRLY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FPAFF - BRRLY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BABB - BRRLY | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYCBF - BRRLY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BMBOY - BRRLY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BYCBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYCBF and CELV have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYCBF and CELV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYCBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYCBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CELV - BYCBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| ASBFY - BYCBF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| BABB - BYCBF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRRLY - BYCBF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.58% | ||
| CFEIY - BYCBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||