BRSGF
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
240.88M
CWD
Price
$5.28
Change
-$0.38 (-6.71%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.56M
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs CWD

Header iconBRSGF vs CWD Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs CWDBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$6.00
Change+$0.40 (+7.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization240.88M
CaliberCos
Price$5.28
Change-$0.38 (-6.71%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization25.56M
BRSGF vs CWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. CWD commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Buy and CWD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $6.00 vs. CWD: $5.66)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and CWD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 67% vs. CWD: 8%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $240.88M vs. CWD: $25.56M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $240.88M. CWD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $25.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the long-term than CWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CWD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the short-term than CWD.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while CWD (@Investment Managers) price change was -25.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.06% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($241M) has a higher market cap than CWD($25.6M). BRSGF YTD gains are higher at: 13.208 vs. CWD (-59.514). BRSGF has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. CWD (683K). BRSGF has less debt than CWD: BRSGF (31.8M) vs CWD (64.4M).
BRSGFCWDBRSGF / CWD
Capitalization241M25.6M941%
EBITDAN/A-11M-
Gain YTD13.208-59.514-22%
P/E Ratio4.78N/A-
RevenueN/A32.3M-
Total Cash12.9M683K1,889%
Total Debt31.8M64.4M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFCWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YB20.940.90
+4.46%
Yuanbao Inc
AROC26.510.80
+3.11%
Archrock
FCCO28.91-0.12
-0.41%
First Community Corp
AEP107.86-1.02
-0.94%
American Electric Power Company
PSHG1.99-0.06
-2.93%
Performance Shipping

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with TGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then TGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
TGE - BRSGF
49%
Loosely correlated
-11.74%
CWD - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
OWL - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
GEG - BRSGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGNX - BRSGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.26%
More

CWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWD and BRSGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWD and BRSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWD
1D Price
Change %
CWD100%
-5.67%
BRSGF - CWD
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BENF - CWD
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
TGE - CWD
12%
Poorly correlated
-11.74%
KBDC - CWD
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CRBG - CWD
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More