BRSGF
Price
$6.04
Change
-$0.22 (-3.51%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
240.88M
GEG
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.07 (-2.83%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
69.59M
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs GEG

Header iconBRSGF vs GEG Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs GEGBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$6.04
Change-$0.22 (-3.51%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization240.88M
Great Elm Group
Price$2.40
Change-$0.07 (-2.83%)
Volume$135.57K
Capitalization69.59M
BRSGF vs GEG Comparison Chart in %
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. GEG commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Buy and GEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $6.04 vs. GEG: $2.40)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and GEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 392% vs. GEG: 31%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $240.88M vs. GEG: $69.59M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $240.88M. GEG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $69.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGEG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the long-term than GEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BRSGF and GEG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.96% price change this week, while GEG (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

GEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($241M) has a higher market cap than GEG($69.6M). GEG has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: GEG (6.47) vs BRSGF (4.78). GEG YTD gains are higher at: 32.597 vs. BRSGF (13.962). GEG has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. BRSGF (12.9M). BRSGF has less debt than GEG: BRSGF (31.8M) vs GEG (62.6M).
BRSGFGEGBRSGF / GEG
Capitalization241M69.6M346%
EBITDAN/A21M-
Gain YTD13.96232.59743%
P/E Ratio4.786.4774%
RevenueN/A16.3M-
Total Cash12.9M109M12%
Total Debt31.8M62.6M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF vs GEG: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
GEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9377
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6793
SMR RATING
1..100
2247
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9585
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GEG (70) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (93) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (47) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (49) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

GEG's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BRSGF (95) in the null industry. This means that GEG’s stock grew similarly to BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFGEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCNTU481.0020.75
+4.51%
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co.
NVNXF0.460.01
+2.31%
NOVONIX Ltd.
BLHEF246.84N/A
N/A
Baloise Holdings AG
RBNK22.25N/A
N/A
RiverBank Holding Company
WDOFF15.99-0.28
-1.72%
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with TGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then TGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
-3.50%
TGE - BRSGF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
CWD - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
OWL - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
GEG - BRSGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
FGNX - BRSGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

GEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEG and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEG and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEG
1D Price
Change %
GEG100%
-2.83%
VRTS - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
STEP - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
IVZ - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
BRSGF - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
MAIN - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
More