BRSGF
Price
$6.63
Change
+$0.13 (+2.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
240.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GEG
Price
$2.47
Change
-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs GEG

Header iconBRSGF vs GEG Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs GEGBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$6.63
Change+$0.13 (+2.00%)
Volume$213
Capitalization240.88M
Great Elm Group
Price$2.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization82.57M
BRSGF vs GEG Comparison Chart in %
BRSGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GEG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. GEG commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Hold and GEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $6.63 vs. GEG: $2.48)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and GEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 6% vs. GEG: 35%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $240.88M vs. GEG: $82.57M
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $240.88M. GEG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $82.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRSGF is a better buy in the long-term than GEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GEG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEG is a better buy in the short-term than BRSGF.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +8.18% price change this week, while GEG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRSGF($241M) has a higher market cap than GEG($82.6M). GEG has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: GEG (40.51) vs BRSGF (4.78). GEG YTD gains are higher at: 38.122 vs. BRSGF (25.094). GEG has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. BRSGF (12.9M). BRSGF has less debt than GEG: BRSGF (31.8M) vs GEG (62.6M).
BRSGFGEGBRSGF / GEG
Capitalization241M82.6M292%
EBITDAN/A21M-
Gain YTD25.09438.12266%
P/E Ratio4.7840.5112%
RevenueN/A16.3M-
Total Cash12.9M109M12%
Total Debt31.8M62.6M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF vs GEG: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
GEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4983
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6187
SMR RATING
1..100
2246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
923
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRSGF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GEG (79) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (87) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (46) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

BRSGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GEG (48) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BRSGF’s stock grew similarly to GEG’s over the last 12 months.

GEG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRSGF (92) in the null industry. This means that GEG’s stock grew significantly faster than BRSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFGEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GEG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSPKY6.98N/A
N/A
COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited
CYSM15.00N/A
N/A
Community Bancorp of Santa Maria
JASUF0.03N/A
N/A
Jasmine International Public Co., Ltd.
RREE0.08N/A
N/A
ResourceTec Corporation
SOMLY8.36-0.02
-0.24%
Secom Co., Ltd.

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSGF has been loosely correlated with HSDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSGF jumps, then HSDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
HSDT - BRSGF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
TGE - BRSGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-9.09%
CWD - BRSGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
GECC - BRSGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
GSBD - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

GEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEG and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEG and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEG
1D Price
Change %
GEG100%
+0.81%
VRTS - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
STEP - GEG
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
IVZ - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
EQS - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
BRSGF - GEG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More