BRSGF
Price
$2.50
Change
+$1.51 (+152.53%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
224.46M
STEP
Price
$61.88
Change
+$0.77 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRSGF vs STEP

Header iconBRSGF vs STEP Comparison
Open Charts BRSGF vs STEPBanner chart's image
Queens Rd Cap Invt
Price$2.50
Change+$1.51 (+152.53%)
Volume$100
Capitalization224.46M
StepStone Group
Price$61.88
Change+$0.77 (+1.26%)
Volume$302.17K
Capitalization2.3B
BRSGF vs STEP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRSGF vs. STEP commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSGF is a Buy and STEP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BRSGF: $2.50 vs. STEP: $61.88)
Brand notoriety: BRSGF and STEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRSGF: 35% vs. STEP: 48%
Market capitalization -- BRSGF: $224.46M vs. STEP: $2.3B
BRSGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $224.46M. STEP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRSGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BRSGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRSGF and STEP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRSGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STEP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRSGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STEP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STEP is a better buy in the short-term than BRSGF.

Price Growth

BRSGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STEP (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

STEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STEP($2.3B) has a higher market cap than BRSGF($224M). STEP has higher P/E ratio than BRSGF: STEP (38.72) vs BRSGF (3.33). STEP YTD gains are higher at: 8.586 vs. BRSGF (-52.830). STEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 225M vs. BRSGF (-30.08M). STEP has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. BRSGF (12.9M). BRSGF has less debt than STEP: BRSGF (367K) vs STEP (242M). STEP has higher revenues than BRSGF: STEP (527M) vs BRSGF (-26.62M).
BRSGFSTEPBRSGF / STEP
Capitalization224M2.3B10%
EBITDA-30.08M225M-13%
Gain YTD-52.8308.586-615%
P/E Ratio3.3338.729%
Revenue-26.62M527M-5%
Total Cash12.9M174M7%
Total Debt367K242M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRSGF: Fundamental Ratings
BRSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRSGFSTEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA316.0610.76
+3.52%
Tesla
SPY637.102.68
+0.42%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X117947.370000311.484380
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL213.880.12
+0.06%
Apple
GME23.33-0.20
-0.85%
GameStop Corp

BRSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRSGF and OWL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRSGF and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRSGF
1D Price
Change %
BRSGF100%
N/A
OWL - BRSGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
AAMI - BRSGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
STEP - BRSGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
MGLD - BRSGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.91%
VINP - BRSGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More