Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRSVX vs SSGSX
BRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BRSVX vs SSGSX
Bridgeway Small-Cap Value
Price$37.01
Change+$1.20 (+3.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.2M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.54
Change+$1.48 (+3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34B
BRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.34B vs. BRSVX (350M). BRSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: BRSVX (1.67) vs SSGSX (0.50). BRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BRSVX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than BRSVX (0.89). BRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). BRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: BRSVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). BRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. SSGSX (-5.63). BRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 102.60 vs. SSGSX (12.40).
| BRSVX | SSGSX | BRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.097 | -5.104 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 350M | 5.34B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.50 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -5.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.42 | -11.79 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.60 | 12.40 | 827% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.47 | 11.63 | 718% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement