Advertisement
BRSYF vs SNWV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRSYF is a Hold and SNWV is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRSYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNWV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BRSYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SNWV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRSYF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNWV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRSYF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SNWV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BRSYF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNWV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -9.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.44%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.04% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BRSYF | SNWV | BRSYF / SNWV | |
| Capitalization | 295M | 325M | 91% |
| EBITDA | 8.3M | -26.74M | -31% |
| Gain YTD | 74.286 | 64.696 | 115% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.21 | 5.41 | 725% |
| Revenue | 46.1M | 39.2M | 118% |
| Total Cash | 78M | 8.5M | 918% |
| Total Debt | 6.13M | 28M | 22% |
BRSYF | SNWV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNWV's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSYF (70). This means that SNWV’s stock grew similarly to BRSYF’s over the last 12 months.
BRSYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNWV (100). This means that BRSYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNWV’s over the last 12 months.
BRSYF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SNWV (100). This means that BRSYF’s stock grew similarly to SNWV’s over the last 12 months.
SNWV's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BRSYF (36). This means that SNWV’s stock grew similarly to BRSYF’s over the last 12 months.
SNWV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRSYF (100). This means that SNWV’s stock grew significantly faster than BRSYF’s over the last 12 months.
| BRSYF | SNWV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 17% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 23% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 13% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
BRSYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRSYF has been loosely correlated with ANSLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRSYF jumps, then ANSLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRSYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRSYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ANSLY - BRSYF | 61% Loosely correlated | +13.73% | ||
| IOBCF - BRSYF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VERO - BRSYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WUXIF - BRSYF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNWV - BRSYF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||
SNWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNWV and BIAF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNWV and BIAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNWV | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| BIAF - SNWV | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| TCHBF - SNWV | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRSYF - SNWV | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDNT - SNWV | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ICUI - SNWV | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.47% | ||
More | ||||