It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRTHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKNCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KNCAF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BRTHF (@Commercial Printing/Forms) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KNCAF (@Commercial Printing/Forms) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Commercial Printing/Forms industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.47%.
Commercial Printing/Forms industry includes companies that provide printing services, business forms, letterheads, commercial printing and product labels. Some companies in this business are also involved with pre-press operations and desktop publishing. Like many other businesses, the commercial printing industry has also been adopting newer technologies (like advanced digital high-speed inkjet) to up the ante on the modern-day digitally progressive enterprise landscape. Prominent players in this industry include Cimpress N.V., Deluxe Corporation and Ennis, Inc,. to name a few.
BRTHF | KNCAF | BRTHF / KNCAF | |
Capitalization | 4.35B | 1.71B | 255% |
EBITDA | 106B | 13.9B | 763% |
Gain YTD | 15.358 | -23.885 | -64% |
P/E Ratio | 19.26 | 33.51 | 57% |
Revenue | 851B | 1.13T | 75% |
Total Cash | 174B | 126B | 138% |
Total Debt | 600M | 438B | 0% |
BRTHF | KNCAF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRTHF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as KNCAF (45). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew similarly to KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KNCAF (100). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew similarly to KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KNCAF (100). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew significantly faster than KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as KNCAF (64). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew similarly to KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as KNCAF (92). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew similarly to KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF | KNCAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago29% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago28% | 3 days ago25% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago21% | 3 days ago29% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRTHF and ACTG have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRTHF and ACTG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
ACTG - BRTHF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
KNCAY - BRTHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EBF - BRTHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
ACCO - BRTHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
KNCAF - BRTHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KNCAF and KNCAY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KNCAF and KNCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNCAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNCAF | 100% | N/A | ||
KNCAY - KNCAF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EBF - KNCAF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
ACCO - KNCAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
ACTG - KNCAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
HNI - KNCAF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
More |