It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRTHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKNCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRTHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KNCAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRTHF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -17.69% price change this week, while KNCAF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +8.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.35%.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
BRTHF | KNCAF | BRTHF / KNCAF | |
Capitalization | 4.02B | 1.85B | 218% |
EBITDA | 105B | -15.9B | -660% |
Gain YTD | 2.425 | 31.392 | 8% |
P/E Ratio | 14.29 | 85.47 | 17% |
Revenue | 815B | 1.13T | 72% |
Total Cash | 130B | 183B | 71% |
Total Debt | 37.4B | 568B | 7% |
BRTHF | KNCAF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRTHF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KNCAF (45). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KNCAF (100). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew similarly to KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KNCAF (100). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew significantly faster than KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
KNCAF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BRTHF (63). This means that KNCAF’s stock grew similarly to BRTHF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KNCAF (92). This means that BRTHF’s stock grew significantly faster than KNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
BRTHF | KNCAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago47% | 3 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago36% | 3 days ago29% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago31% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago25% | 3 days ago54% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago28% | 3 days ago27% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago23% | 3 days ago28% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago20% | 3 days ago40% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRTHF and ACTG have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRTHF and ACTG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
ACTG - BRTHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
KNCAY - BRTHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.48% | ||
EBF - BRTHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
ACCO - BRTHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
KNCAF - BRTHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KNCAF and KNCAY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KNCAF and KNCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNCAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNCAF | 100% | N/A | ||
KNCAY - KNCAF | 14% Poorly correlated | -4.48% | ||
EBF - KNCAF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
ACCO - KNCAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
ACTG - KNCAF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
HNI - KNCAF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
More |