Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs RMFCX
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs RMFCX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
Price$16.58
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.95B
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BRUKX (308M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: RMFCX (1.26) vs BRUKX (1.14). BRUKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUKX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BRUKX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: BRUKX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. BRUKX (2.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.33 vs. BRUKX (42.25).
| BRUKX | RMFCX | BRUKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 10.997 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 308M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.53 | 9.06 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.45 | 23.36 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.25 | 55.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers