Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs RMFCX
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs RMFCX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2
Price$17.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.43
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.75B
BRUKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUKX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. BRUKX (317M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BRUKX (1.09). BRUKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUKX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BRUKX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: BRUKX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. BRUKX (0.29). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.70 vs. BRUKX (46.12).
| BRUKX | RMFCX | BRUKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.109 | 15.389 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 317M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 7.82 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.26 | 37.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.12 | 60.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.63 | 91.06 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers