Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRWIX vs RGAHX
BRWIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BRWIX vs RGAHX
AMG Boston Common Global Impact I
Price$41.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.87M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$82.60
Change+$0.46 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
BRWIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRWIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. BRWIX (531M). BRWIX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: BRWIX (1.08) vs RGAHX (0.47). BRWIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BRWIX (40 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BRWIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BRWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRWIX: RGAHX (250) vs BRWIX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. BRWIX (3.89). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 47.19 vs. BRWIX (-21.76).
| BRWIX | RGAHX | BRWIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.44 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.281 | 12.473 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.47 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 12.87 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.88 | 60.71 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.76 | 47.19 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.16 | N/A | - |