BRWXF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
23.24M
FSM
Price
$7.50
Change
+$0.04 (+0.54%)
Updated
Aug 29, 10:40 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRWXF vs FSM

Header iconBRWXF vs FSM Comparison
Open Charts BRWXF vs FSMBanner chart's image
BRUNSWICK EXPL
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$106.76K
Capitalization23.24M
Fortuna Mining
Price$7.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.54%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization2.28B
BRWXF vs FSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRWXF vs. FSM commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWXF is a Hold and FSM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BRWXF: $0.09 vs. FSM: $7.45)
Brand notoriety: BRWXF and FSM are both not notable
BRWXF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while FSM is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRWXF: 144% vs. FSM: 120%
Market capitalization -- BRWXF: $23.24M vs. FSM: $2.28B
BRWXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $23.24M. FSM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRWXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BRWXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BRWXF is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BRWXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BRWXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than BRWXF.

Price Growth

BRWXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.84% price change this week, while FSM (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +119.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.76% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+4.86% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.28B) has a higher market cap than BRWXF($23.2M). FSM YTD gains are higher at: 73.660 vs. BRWXF (-17.405). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 564M vs. BRWXF (-7.98M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. BRWXF (3.33M). BRWXF has less debt than FSM: BRWXF (0) vs FSM (216M). FSM has higher revenues than BRWXF: FSM (1.19B) vs BRWXF (0).
BRWXFFSMBRWXF / FSM
Capitalization23.2M2.28B1%
EBITDA-7.98M564M-1%
Gain YTD-17.40573.660-24%
P/E RatioN/A13.55-
Revenue01.19B-
Total Cash3.33M394M1%
Total Debt0216M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BRWXFFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BRWXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANVIX28.99N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Large-Cap Value Fund Inst
MERIX17.94N/A
N/A
The Merger Fund I
LEOIX9.07N/A
N/A
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Instl
TRUZX57.33N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Z
VLEOX62.90-0.06
-0.10%
Value Line Small Cap Opportunities Inv

BRWXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRWXF and NGD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRWXF and NGD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRWXF
1D Price
Change %
BRWXF100%
+0.44%
NGD - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
FSM - BRWXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
EQX - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
AUMBF - BRWXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
SAND - BRWXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More