BSAC
Price
$23.86
Change
+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 27, 11:14 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.23B
64 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$39.12
Change
-$0.16 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 27, 11:53 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.4B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs IFS

Header iconBSAC vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BSAC vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco Santander-Chile
Price$23.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.23B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$39.12
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
Volume$300
Capitalization4.4B
BSAC vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSAC vs. IFS commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a StrongBuy and IFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BSAC: $23.77 vs. IFS: $39.28)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 176% vs. IFS: 62%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $11.23B vs. IFS: $4.4B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BSAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSAC is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSAC($11.2B) has a higher market cap than IFS($4.4B). BSAC has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BSAC (10.09) vs IFS (8.56). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 38.168 vs. BSAC (33.272). IFS has less debt than BSAC: IFS (12B) vs BSAC (10.68T). BSAC has higher revenues than IFS: BSAC (2.8T) vs IFS (6.94B).
BSACIFSBSAC / IFS
Capitalization11.2B4.4B254%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.27238.16887%
P/E Ratio10.098.56118%
Revenue2.8T6.94B40,311%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.68T12B88,975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3632
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8178
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSAC (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSGCX10.240.08
+0.79%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth C
JUEQX27.260.14
+0.52%
JPMorgan US Equity R4
RRRRX21.58N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl
LSVAX20.04N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Admin
TNVDX10.67N/A
N/A
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I

BSAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSAC has been closely correlated with BCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSAC jumps, then BCH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSAC
1D Price
Change %
BSAC100%
+0.08%
BCH - BSAC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
BAP - BSAC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
CIB - BSAC
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
IFS - BSAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
LYG - BSAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More