BSAC
Price
$26.39
Change
+$0.36 (+1.38%)
Updated
Oct 8, 10:48 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.5B
22 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$40.37
Change
+$0.16 (+0.40%)
Updated
Oct 8, 11:04 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.46B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSAC vs IFS

Header iconBSAC vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BSAC vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco Santander-Chile
Price$26.39
Change+$0.36 (+1.38%)
Volume$2.85K
Capitalization12.5B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$40.37
Change+$0.16 (+0.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.46B
BSAC vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSAC vs. IFS commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSAC is a Hold and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BSAC: $26.03 vs. IFS: $40.21)
Brand notoriety: BSAC and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSAC: 88% vs. IFS: 56%
Market capitalization -- BSAC: $12.5B vs. IFS: $4.46B
BSAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.5B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BSAC and IFS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than BSAC.

Price Growth

BSAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.18% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSAC($12.5B) has a higher market cap than IFS($4.46B). BSAC has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BSAC (11.06) vs IFS (8.66). BSAC YTD gains are higher at: 45.943 vs. IFS (41.440). IFS has less debt than BSAC: IFS (12B) vs BSAC (11.98T). BSAC has higher revenues than IFS: BSAC (2.83T) vs IFS (6.94B).
BSACIFSBSAC / IFS
Capitalization12.5B4.46B280%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.94341.440111%
P/E Ratio11.068.66128%
Revenue2.83T6.94B40,772%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt11.98T12B99,808%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSAC vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BSAC
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2628
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4385
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSAC (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSAC’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (28) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (46) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BSAC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (85) in the null industry. This means that BSAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSACIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBCM23.860.11
+0.46%
Neuberger Berman Commodity Stgy ETF
PJUL45.62-0.01
-0.02%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul
RXD10.50-0.02
-0.15%
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
DIVL23.12-0.12
-0.50%
Madison Dividend Value ETF
FFDI30.32-0.32
-1.05%
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF