Ad is loading...
BSCAX vs SSGSX
BSCAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSCAX vs SSGSX
Brandes Small Cap Value A
Price$16.03
Change+$0.39 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.99M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
BSCAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCAX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCAX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. BSCAX (119M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than BSCAX: SSGSX (0.54) vs BSCAX (0.27). BSCAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BSCAX (7 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). BSCAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). BSCAX (38.36) and SSGSX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. BSCAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. BSCAX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. SSGSX (-13.71). BSCAX return over 5 years is better than : 115.91 vs. SSGSX (20.02).
| BSCAX | SSGSX | BSCAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.459 | -11.566 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 5.44B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.54 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | -13.71 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.97 | -10.63 | -357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.91 | 20.02 | 579% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...