Ad is loading...
BSCAX vs SSGSX
BSCAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSCAX vs SSGSX
Brandes Small Cap Value A
Price$14.59
Change+$0.15 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.53M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$39.45
Change+$0.34 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
BSCAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCAX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. BSCAX (104M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than BSCAX: SSGSX (0.52) vs BSCAX (0.26). BSCAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BSCAX (7 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). BSCAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). BSCAX (38.36) and SSGSX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. BSCAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. BSCAX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. SSGSX (-14.16). BSCAX return over 5 years is better than : 111.37 vs. SSGSX (19.58).
| BSCAX | SSGSX | BSCAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.636 | -15.141 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 5.22B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.52 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.41 | -14.16 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.13 | -17.25 | -105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.37 | 19.58 | 569% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers