Ad is loading...
BSCFX vs NRGEX
BSCFX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts BSCFX vs NRGEX
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$61.26
Change+$1.20 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.98B
BSCFX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. BSCFX (3.61B). NRGEX pays higher dividends than BSCFX: NRGEX (0.58) vs BSCFX (0.00). BSCFX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: BSCFX (28 years) vs NRGEX (3 years). BSCFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). NRGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. BSCFX (10.47). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCFX: NRGEX (0) vs BSCFX (2000). NRGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.23 vs. BSCFX (-13.27).
| BSCFX | NRGEX | BSCFX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.03 | 4,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.69 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.242 | -8.333 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.61B | 8.98B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.27 | -5.23 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.60 | 5.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.43 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...