Ad is loading...
BSCFX vs NRGEX
BSCFX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts BSCFX vs NRGEX
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$61.27
Change-$1.12 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.57B
BSCFX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 9.57B vs. BSCFX (4.6B). NRGEX pays higher dividends than BSCFX: NRGEX (0.54) vs BSCFX (0.00). BSCFX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: BSCFX (27 years) vs NRGEX (3 years). BSCFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). NRGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. BSCFX (10.47). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCFX: NRGEX (0) vs BSCFX (2000). NRGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.79 vs. BSCFX (-13.77).
| BSCFX | NRGEX | BSCFX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.03 | 4,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.69 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.660 | -4.777 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.6B | 9.57B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.77 | -0.79 | 1,736% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.23 | 0.31 | -724% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.32 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers