Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCMX vs SSGSX
BSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSCMX vs SSGSX
Brandes Small Cap Value I
Price$17.83
Change+$0.40 (+2.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.22M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
BSCMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. BSCMX (152M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than BSCMX: SSGSX (0.52) vs BSCMX (0.38). BSCMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BSCMX (7 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than BSCMX (1.19). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BSCMX (22.02). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSCMX: SSGSX (2500) vs BSCMX (100000). BSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.72 vs. SSGSX (-4.86). BSCMX return over 5 years is better than : 136.00 vs. SSGSX (29.23).
| BSCMX | SSGSX | BSCMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.006 | -5.600 | -89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 5.64B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.52 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.72 | -4.86 | -385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.59 | -1.23 | -4,782% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.00 | 29.23 | 465% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers