BSEAF
Price
$3.00
Change
-$0.41 (-12.02%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
98.19M
CKNHF
Price
$49.04
Change
-$0.32 (-0.65%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEAF vs CKNHF

Header iconBSEAF vs CKNHF Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs CKNHFBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$3.00
Change-$0.41 (-12.02%)
Volume$10.16K
Capitalization98.19M
Clarkson Horace
Price$49.04
Change-$0.32 (-0.65%)
Volume$176
Capitalization1.49B
BSEAF vs CKNHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. CKNHF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and CKNHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $3.00 vs. CKNHF: $49.04)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and CKNHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 558% vs. CKNHF: 50%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $98.19M vs. CKNHF: $1.49B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $98.19M. CKNHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCKNHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CKNHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CKNHF is a better buy in the long-term than BSEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSEAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CKNHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSEAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CKNHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CKNHF is a better buy in the short-term than BSEAF.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -11.99% price change this week, while CKNHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.21% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKNHF($1.49B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($98.2M). CKNHF has higher P/E ratio than BSEAF: CKNHF (14.93) vs BSEAF (12.58). BSEAF YTD gains are higher at: 16.395 vs. CKNHF (-0.777). CKNHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 122M vs. BSEAF (16M). CKNHF has more cash in the bank: 335M vs. BSEAF (26M). BSEAF has less debt than CKNHF: BSEAF (28.2M) vs CKNHF (43.8M). CKNHF has higher revenues than BSEAF: CKNHF (649M) vs BSEAF (154M).
BSEAFCKNHFBSEAF / CKNHF
Capitalization98.2M1.49B7%
EBITDA16M122M13%
Gain YTD16.395-0.777-2,111%
P/E Ratio12.5814.9384%
Revenue154M649M24%
Total Cash26M335M8%
Total Debt28.2M43.8M64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs CKNHF: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
CKNHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9097
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6454
SMR RATING
1..100
8250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8743
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSEAF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CKNHF (92). This means that BSEAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CKNHF’s over the last 12 months.

CKNHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (64). This means that CKNHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKNHF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (82). This means that CKNHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKNHF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (61). This means that CKNHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CKNHF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSEAF (87). This means that CKNHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSEAFCKNHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABVN0.90N/A
N/A
ABV Consulting Inc.
EMNSF2.26N/A
N/A
Elementis PLC
OSAGF59.13N/A
N/A
Osram Licht AG
YPHDF475.18N/A
N/A
Ypsomed Holding AG
FOFA0.35N/A
N/A
Family Office of America Inc.

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
N/A
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CKNHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKNHF and WTSHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKNHF and WTSHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKNHF
1D Price
Change %
CKNHF100%
N/A
WTSHF - CKNHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
SOIEF - CKNHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
CICOY - CKNHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
BSEAF - CKNHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCJF - CKNHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More