BSFO
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.88M
BVFL
Price
$15.85
Change
+$0.09 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
118.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSFO vs BVFL

Header iconBSFO vs BVFL Comparison
Open Charts BSFO vs BVFLBanner chart's image
Bank of San Francis
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization41.88M
BV Financial
Price$15.85
Change+$0.09 (+0.57%)
Volume$26.43K
Capitalization118.19M
BSFO vs BVFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSFO vs. BVFL commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSFO is a Hold and BVFL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BSFO: $27.50 vs. BVFL: $15.85)
Brand notoriety: BSFO and BVFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSFO: 9% vs. BVFL: 43%
Market capitalization -- BSFO: $41.88M vs. BVFL: $118.19M
BSFO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $41.88M. BVFL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSFO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBVFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSFO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BVFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVFL is a better buy in the long-term than BSFO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSFO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BVFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSFO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BVFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSFO is a better buy in the short-term than BVFL.

Price Growth

BSFO (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BVFL (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSFO is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

BVFL is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BVFL($118M) has a higher market cap than BSFO($41.9M). BSFO (7.38) and BVFL (7.07) have similar P/E ratio . BVFL YTD gains are higher at: -7.956 vs. BSFO (-14.063). BSFO has less debt than BVFL: BSFO (2.76M) vs BVFL (37.3M). BVFL has higher revenues than BSFO: BVFL (37.8M) vs BSFO (23.4M).
BSFOBVFLBSFO / BVFL
Capitalization41.9M118M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.063-7.956177%
P/E Ratio7.387.07104%
Revenue23.4M37.8M62%
Total CashN/A3.15M-
Total Debt2.76M37.3M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSFO vs BVFL: Fundamental Ratings
BSFO
BVFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
5760
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSFO's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BVFL (47). This means that BSFO’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BSFO's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVFL (100). This means that BSFO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BSFO's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BVFL (60). This means that BSFO’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFO (78). This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to BSFO’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSFO (52). This means that BVFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSFO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSFOBVFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDIV0.240.09
+56.25%
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.
AMCCF9.720.57
+6.23%
Amcor plc
TOEYF0.12N/A
N/A
Toro Energy Ltd.
IIJIY39.71N/A
N/A
Internet Initiative Japan, Inc.
COPJF0.14N/A
N/A
AMPLITUDE ENERGY LTD

BSFO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSFO and CIBH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSFO and CIBH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSFO
1D Price
Change %
BSFO100%
N/A
CIBH - BSFO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPCGF - BSFO
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVFL - BSFO
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
BPHLY - BSFO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - BSFO
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
+0.57%
WAL - BVFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
HBAN - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
SNV - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WBS - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
EWBC - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More