Ad is loading...
BSGLX vs CNPAX
BSGLX vs CNPAX Comparison
Open Charts BSGLX vs CNPAX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr I
Price$33.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.57M
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
BSGLX vs CNPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSGLX vs. CNPAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSGLX is a Buy and CNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. BSGLX (899M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than BSGLX: CNPAX (0.54) vs BSGLX (0.00). BSGLX was incepted earlier than CNPAX: BSGLX (8 years) vs CNPAX (23 years). BSGLX (0.81) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). BSGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). BSGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: BSGLX (0) vs CNPAX (250). BSGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. CNPAX (5.29). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. BSGLX (40.01).
| BSGLX | CNPAX | BSGLX / CNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.77 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.77 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.240 | 2.294 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 899M | 142B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.46 | 5.29 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.33 | 28.34 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.01 | 47.64 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...