Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBAX
BSICX vs CUBAX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBAX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.32B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.46M
BSICX vs CUBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 41.3B vs. CUBAX (631M). CUBAX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBAX (5.04) vs BSICX (3.81). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBAX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBAX (11 years). BSICX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CUBAX (0.94). BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBAX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CUBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. BSICX (5.90). CUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.29 vs. BSICX (12.43).
| BSICX | CUBAX | BSICX / CUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.90 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.94 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.784 | 2.015 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3B | 631M | 6,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 5.04 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 6.58 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 16.36 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.43 | 26.29 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.53 | 34.78 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement