Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBAX
BSICX vs CUBAX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBAX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.06B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.74
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.91M
BSICX vs CUBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 42.1B vs. CUBAX (642M). CUBAX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBAX (5.00) vs BSICX (3.76). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBAX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBAX (11 years). BSICX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CUBAX (0.94). BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBAX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CUBAX (6.75) and BSICX (6.52) have marching annual gain over last year. CUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.44 vs. BSICX (12.10).
| BSICX | CUBAX | BSICX / CUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.90 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.94 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.279 | 3.137 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 642M | 6,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 5.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 6.75 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 18.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 24.44 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.84 | 36.42 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers