Ad is loading...
BSICX vs CUBCX
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.07B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.13M
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBCX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. CUBCX (632M). CUBCX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBCX (4.34) vs BSICX (3.84). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). BSICX (1.73) and CUBCX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1005.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSICX (7.20) and CUBCX (7.10) have marching annual gain over last year. CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.64 vs. BSICX (13.91).
| BSICX | CUBCX | BSICX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.67 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.68 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 1.631 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1B | 632M | 6,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 4.34 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 7.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 12.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.91 | 22.64 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.09 | 25.10 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...