Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBCX
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.5B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.64M
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBCX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 42.5B vs. CUBCX (652M). CUBCX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBCX (4.17) vs BSICX (3.71). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). BSICX (1.70) and CUBCX (1.69) have similar cost to investors . BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSICX (6.04) and CUBCX (6.02) have marching annual gain over last year. CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.00 vs. BSICX (10.44).
| BSICX | CUBCX | BSICX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.65 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.69 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 3.716 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5B | 652M | 6,518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 4.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.04 | 6.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.77 | 15.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.44 | 19.00 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.83 | 28.13 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers