Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBCX
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.06B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.75
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.91M
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 42.1B vs. CUBCX (642M). CUBCX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBCX (4.25) vs BSICX (3.76). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). BSICX (1.70) and CUBCX (1.69) have similar cost to investors . BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. CUBCX (5.95). CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.84 vs. BSICX (12.10).
| BSICX | CUBCX | BSICX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.65 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.69 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.279 | 2.815 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1B | 642M | 6,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 4.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 5.95 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.95 | 16.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 19.84 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.84 | 26.55 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers