Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSICX vs CUBCX
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSICX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Inv C
Price$9.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.32B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.46M
BSICX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSICX vs. CUBCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSICX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSICX has more cash in the bank: 41.3B vs. CUBCX (631M). CUBCX pays higher dividends than BSICX: CUBCX (4.29) vs BSICX (3.81). BSICX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSICX (17 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). BSICX (1.70) and CUBCX (1.69) have similar cost to investors . BSICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). BSICX (1000) and CUBCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BSICX (5.90) and CUBCX (5.78) have marching annual gain over last year. CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.62 vs. BSICX (12.43).
| BSICX | CUBCX | BSICX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.65 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.69 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.784 | 1.762 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3B | 631M | 6,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 4.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 5.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 13.77 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.43 | 21.62 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.53 | 25.02 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement