Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSIIX vs CUBAX
BSIIX vs CUBAX Comparison
Open Charts BSIIX vs CUBAX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps Instl
Price$9.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.32B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.46M
BSIIX vs CUBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIIX vs. CUBAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIIX is a Hold and CUBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIIX has more cash in the bank: 41.3B vs. CUBAX (631M). CUBAX pays higher dividends than BSIIX: CUBAX (5.04) vs BSIIX (4.78). BSIIX was incepted earlier than CUBAX: BSIIX (17 years) vs CUBAX (11 years). CUBAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than BSIIX (0.71). BSIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBAX (450.00). CUBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIIX: CUBAX (1000) vs BSIIX (2000000). BSIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. CUBAX (6.58). CUBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.29 vs. BSIIX (18.15).
| BSIIX | CUBAX | BSIIX / CUBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.222 | 2.015 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3B | 631M | 6,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 5.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 6.58 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 16.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.15 | 26.29 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.17 | 34.78 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement