The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the Dynamic Food & Beverage IntellidexSM Index... Show more
The Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF seeks to track the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index, investing at least 90% of its assets in the securities that make up that benchmark. The index is composed of U.S. companies engaged principally in the manufacture, sale, or distribution of food and beverage products, agricultural products, and related food-technology businesses. The fund uses a passive, index-replication structure with a multifactor, tiered equal-weighting approach rather than a simple market-cap weighting, and it is classified as non-diversified. Its expense ratio is approximately 0.63%.
The portfolio holds roughly 32–33 positions, with a top-heavy but not extreme concentration: the largest 10 holdings account for close to half of total assets. Consumer defensive (staples) exposure is dominant at about 79%, with additional weightings in consumer cyclical (around 11%), industrials (about 5%), and basic materials (about 5%). This structure tilts the fund toward lower-volatility, cash-generative businesses while retaining meaningful sensitivity to agricultural input prices through names such as Archer-Daniels-Midland and Corteva.
The food and beverage sector operates at the intersection of several macro themes. Persistent inflation in food inputs and labor has pressured margins, even as consumer staples companies have demonstrated pricing power. Agricultural commodity markets—including grains, oilseeds, and coffee—directly influence the earnings of processors, distributors, and beverage makers, creating dispersion within the sector. Rising coffee costs have been a particular headwind for coffee-centric operators, while crop-price volatility shapes results for agricultural merchants and seed-and-crop-chemical providers.
Interest-rate expectations also matter. Staples are often treated as bond-proxy equities, so their relative appeal can shift as Treasury yields move. Meanwhile, discussions around appetite-suppressing GLP-1 medications continue to frame long-term demand questions for packaged foods and snacks, even though near-term consumption data has remained resilient. Consumer spending rotation between staples and discretionary categories is another recurring driver for this group.
Over the trailing 30 days, PBJ has advanced roughly 4%, recovering from a September low. The prior three-month stretch has been essentially flat, masking a meaningful intra-period path: the fund traded near its recent highs in late August before drifting lower through September and touching a trough near the end of that month, then rebounding through October as defensive positioning found renewed demand.
The recovery has been broad-based rather than driven by a single stock. Large weighted holdings such as Coca-Cola, Monster Beverage, and Starbucks provide stability, while agricultural-linked positions like Archer-Daniels-Midland and Corteva add sensitivity to crop prices and farm-economics sentiment. Grocery and packaged-food operators, including Kroger (KR) and Hershey (HSY), contribute a steadier, lower-beta element to returns. The fund's sector allocation—dominated by consumer staples—helps explain its relatively contained volatility compared with more cyclical equity strategies.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery platform that helps investors scan thousands of securities using technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility measures, AI-generated signals, market trends, price patterns, and customizable filters. It is designed to surface trending securities, breakout candidates, and new trading opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, while also supporting industry-level filters for thematic comparisons such as the food and beverage complex. Investors seeking to complement a core holding like PBJ can use the screener to identify related names and evaluate sector momentum across a broader opportunity set.
Looking ahead, several structural factors are likely to shape PBJ's environment. The trajectory of inflation—especially food and agricultural input costs—will remain central to margins and pricing decisions across the portfolio. Interest-rate policy will influence the relative attractiveness of defensive, dividend-oriented staples versus higher-yielding fixed income. Commodity prices for grains, oilseeds, and coffee will continue to swing the earnings outlook for agricultural and beverage-linked holdings.
Investors should also monitor consumer demand resilience, ongoing GLP-1-related debates over packaged-food volumes, and the competitive landscape across grocery, snacks, and beverages. Corporate earnings cycles for large weighted positions, along with capital flows into consumer staples ETFs broadly, will help determine whether the recent recovery in defensive equities extends. As with any sector fund, concentration in food and beverage names means that industry-specific shocks—regulatory changes, supply-chain disruptions, or shifts in dietary trends—can have an outsized effect on returns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 10-day moving average for PBJ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 60 cases where PBJ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PBJ as a result. In 56 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
PBJ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +0.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PBJ advanced for three days, in 240 of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 208 of 283 cases where PBJ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for PBJ moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 34 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 31 of the 34 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PBJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
PBJ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows